In which The Gay Recluse scores selected opinion pieces in The Times.

Bob Herbert/Confronting the Kitchen Sink

The Short Version: Why is Hillary being so mean?

In his words: “Why the Clinton forces would want to inject that poisonous bit of business into the campaign is a mystery.”

Score: C- (Childish)
It’s hard to believe that Bob Herbert has been writing about politics for ____ years and is surprised that politics is a dirty business. Wake up!

Gail Collins/And the Good News Is…

The Short Version: This blip in Obama’s campaign will allow voters to see what he’s really made of.

In her words: “So we’ll see. If Barack looks good after his fifth trip to Wilkes-Barre, then he’s the one. If not, there’s still Hillary.”

The Score: A- (Aware)
Another solid performance from Collins, who has been able to maintain a sense of humor and pragmatic distance amid the hurricane of nonsense swirling around this election (like all elections, of course).

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse updates his informal but rather telling quantitative analysis of Modern Love, the weekly Style Section (of The Times) column in which openly gay writers almost never appear, and even less frequently describe a romantic relationship.

This week’s piece: A Signal in the Sky Said: Marry Her

Subject: A goofball straight guy goes on an Outward Bound trip to find himself and in the process realizes he wants to marry his on-again-off-again girlfriend. Given the slim pickings in NYC for SMs, she obviously accepts. For our suggested alternative, click here.

Filed under: Straight Man on “Looking for Love.”
The updated tally (or why we feel like animals in the zoo): 6 out of 169 columns by openly gay writers; 1 out of 169 on female gay relationships; 0 out of 169 on male gay relationships. In what is arguably the “gayest” section of The Times, more women have written about gay men than gay men have.

Outstanding question to Daniel Jones, editor of Modern Love: wtf?

Straight Woman on Relationships iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiii (39)
Straight Woman on Family iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii (35)
Straight Woman on “Looking for Love” iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii ii (32)
Straight Woman on Breaking Up iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iii (23)
Straight Man on Relationships iiiii iiiii i (11)
Straight Man on Breakup iiiiii (6)
Straight Woman on Gay Men iiiii i (6)
Straight Man on Family iiiii (5)
Straight Man on “Looking for Love” iiiii (5)
Gay Man on Family ii (2)
Gay Woman on Relationship i (1)
Gay Woman on Family i (1)
Gay Man on Self-Hatred i (1)
Gay Man on Prom Date i (1)
Ambiguous/Nurse on Drugs i (1)

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse provides an alternative to this week’s more tedious and stereotypical Modern Love offering in The Times.

By Ben Karlin and The Gay Recluse

THE problem was Paolo.

I met him at an Italian restaurant in my neighborhood in Brooklyn, where he was a devastatingly cute waiter and I a frequent customer — and not just because of the devastatingly cute waiter. The food was good, too.

The restaurant was owned and operated and even staffed by “actual” Italians (like OMG from Italy)! One time, Paolo let on that he gave Italian lessons on the side. How hot is that? I had studied in Florence in college and nurtured an abiding interest in Italian language, food and culture. So, not wanting to be the creepy guy who asks the waitress out, I signed up for Italian lessons. That way, I would just be the creepy guy who asks the tutor out. That was wayyyy better.

After some stops and starts and “wacky” misunderstandings involving language, food, culture and Craigslist, we were in something like love — whatev — and living together in our dorm a loft in Greenpoint, Brooklyn. We broke up once, then got back together. We broke up again and then got back together. And then once more. And finally once more after that.

A few years into the “relationship,” I jotted down these deep thoughts: “I need a better quality pen (hint: “pen” is a “metaphor” — lol!) to write about Paolo. What kind of person is he? Besides the obvious. The strength. The beauty. The individuality. The six-pack abs. The “fierceness” of his intellect. (Whadup, Christian S!? LOL!!!) The confidence that may or may not be real. Ok, seriously. How he straddles multiple worlds refusing to be either citizen or stranger in any. Men look at him with something bordering on adoration. He has the ability to show unrestrained joy and still look cool. When he wears a certain hat, he looks like a man out of time, which suits him well. I need a better pen still.”

But things totally fucking fell apart, thanks mainly to the burden of expectation. Mine, naturally. My whole life I had subscribed to the simple notion that it would be apparent when I found my life partner. I wasn’t sure how. But I would know. Like Batman seeing the bat signal in the sky. Unambiguous. No chance of mistaking it for searchlights heralding a movie premiere or the start of the Toyotathon. The kind of clear signal that can only mean, “Batman, we need you.” And I simply didn’t see that with Paolo. So I marched on, eyes scanning the horizon.

But whatev, by the end of that year I was on the outs with Paolo and — thank you, Craigslist! — in the middle of a start with a clever redhead with the most spectacularly smooth and pale skin I had ever encountered. I sensed there weren’t long-term prospects, but I couldn’t figure out why. Besides the whole crystal-meth thing, he was fantastic in most every way.

Was I hung up on Paolo? Had I lost sight of what I really wanted out of a partner? Had I fallen into that Craigslist long con, the one where you think there is an infinite supply of potential mates, and the perfect one is forever around the corner?

So, in a move cribbed from a mid-career Billy Crystal vehicle (I know, yuck), I signed up for an Outward Bound Wilderness Program — a seven-day backcountry camping and sea-kayaking trip in Baja California, Mexico.

On this trip, not only did I intend to learn all the nuances of backcountry camping, but also a variety of kayaking moves, culminating in the famed “Eskimo roll,” a rescue maneuver wherein a capsized kayaker staves off drowning by flipping upright while staying fixed snugly in the hull of his boat. ALSO, I WANTED TO SOLVE ALL MY PROBLEMS INVOLVING EMOTIONAL INTIMACY.

It was an ambitious agenda.

The trip began as a bust. I didn’t have much time for quiet reflection and I didn’t connect with the other “campers.”

There were eight of us — including two instructors. There was a quiet doctor from the Midwest, an even quieter graduate student from one of the Carolinas, a confused Smith College lesbian, a third-shift autoworker and a 20-year-old Peruvian nicknamed Poncho, who desperately wanted to have sex with someone… anyone really.

The group’s comfort level with the outdoors varied wildly, from people who were looking for an intense outdoor experience (Poncho) to people who came on a kayaking trip who don’t like to kayak. Wtf? Never could quite crack the code as to why they were there.

Relief came on Day 4 — the “solo.” Each camper was dropped off in an isolated area and left alone for 24 hours. We were given limited supplies and told the experience was not meant to test our survival skills, but rather to force us to turn inward, to contemplate who we were and wanted to be. OMG, I was like: without a teevee!? LOL.

I was taken to a stretch of sandy beach, abutted by forbidding cactuses and sun-scorched hills. The instructor gave me my supplies for the day: a mat, a tarp, a sleeping bag, sunscreen, a bandana, a water bottle, a bag of water, some magic mushrooms and a small packet of raspberry drink mix.

It was midday and I was supposed to put up the tarp to protect me from the sun. I could not even do this, yet another piece of proof that if truly left alone, I would absolutely “die” out there.

I was told not to move around too much, just to sit and think. The guide would be back in the morning to pick me up so I could rejoin the group and eat a “delicious” breakfast burrito. (As if.)

It was New Year’s Eve.

I was 33 and I had never really been that alone, or at least not without television or internet access. This is what I had come for.

At first I was taciturn. I tried to force myself to focus on important thoughts, but I was soon distracted and looking out to sea for killer whales. Failing that, dolphins. Failing that, how about any kind of jumping fish? I was bored.

Next, I tried to lie back and get a tan. I jacked off. Five minutes later, I was overcome with guilt for treating the solo like a day at the beach. I was supposed to be having epiphanies. The entire afternoon passed without one transcendent thought.

Night came, and with it fear. I marked time by flipping to one side and then the other, taking off layers of clothes, getting up and going to the bathroom. I jacked off again. Time did not stop, but it slowed to an unbearable creep. There was nowhere to go. Nowhere to get up and walk to. No light to turn on. No comfort to be found. Only wind and waves and the creak of branches and twigs underneath my sleeping bag that made me feel very much like a prince dealing with an out-of-control pea situation.

To my surprise, the magic mushrooms didn’t help. Crabs and scorpions began working their way across the sand, as they do every night, only on this night, they run into Hapless Johnson and his useless lean-to. At one point I thought I heard horse hooves and was convinced that thieves were coming to steal my tarp and remaining drink mix — which I was totally saving in case things got really bad.

Eventually, mercifully, light broke. At first in subtle slivers. With it came an intense relief that I had survived the night… though it was a night wholly without danger. (In retrospect, perhaps a brisk wind could have given me a case of the vapors.)

There was a moment, a little before the sun rose, when a patch of clouds turned the most unusual, intense orange I had ever seen (thank you magic mushrooms!!). Obviously I was totally tripping but it was awesome. I said, “Wow,” and then tears came to my eyes. It faded more quickly than it came, giving way to the duller colors of day. New Year’s Day. (Strains of U2, natch.) But my heart was indeed stirred: I had come here for a moment like this.

I stood up and instantly knew I had to marry Paolo.

A signal in the sky told me as much. Moments of pure beauty, I realized, are not handed out like a free newspaper as you dash into the subway. You have to make them. Work for them. Even trip for them. Sometimes, it’s a huge pain and you don’t know how or when they are going to happen. But it is flat-out wrong to expect them, even though I kind of went on this trip expecting one and then did this overnight solo expecting one even more, and it had come. I know I’m not making any sense.

But it was cool. Paolo was work. But like my best friendships and the best jobs I had ever had, life with him had to be cultivated, curated, fussed over. Then came the bliss, in arrhythmic spasms. I had saddled him with an impossible demand: Be my foregone conclusion. Whatever that means, lol!

No specific signal illuminated the sky, literally telling me “Paolo is the one,” but a flash of color did trigger a revelation: What I was looking for in a relationship could be attained only if I was willing to travel great distances for it. Be willing to battle the sun, sleep on twigs – omg! – and suffer through irrational fears of nonexistent thieves. Even be willing to consume a raspberry powdered drink mix that under no circumstances other than complete glucose deprivation would I ever consider putting to my lips. (I like seriously needed a week at The Four Seasons.)

In Paolo, I had found a worthy… travel companion? (OMG, best shrooms ever!)

Later that morning I paddled back to the main campsite and – still tripping a little – ate the most delicious breakfast burrito in my life. Then we paddled to yet another stretch of beach, this one tucked into a bay thick with phosphorescent plankton. (Totally awesome.)

We made a bonfire and had a ritual burning ceremony where we each tossed a symbolic object into the fire, vowing to vanquish that which it represented. I burned “the bat signal,” which in this case took the form of a stick. (Symbolic options being somewhat limited on that particular stretch of beach.)

We buried rocks in the fire, then took those hot rocks into a tepee we had jury-rigged out of tarps. We poured sea water onto the rocks and made ourselves a good old-fashioned Indian sweat lodge. To cool off we mad-dashed into the water, splashing around in the phosphorescence, our thrashing bodies lighting up the sea like neon. It was like being born again, in a totally secular way. It was ecstasy.

Paolo and I were engaged that May, next to a gaping crater on a volcanic island 70 miles off Tunisia. We are so exotic, right? LOL! We married the May after that overlooking the fishing village in Italy where his grandmother was born. Our son, Theo, was born the May after that, nine days before our first wedding anniversary.

Of course I have looked back. Of course I have wondered and doubted if this was the right thing. Life is not a highlight reel. But I have not once looked up to the sky and expected to find my answers there, either (except for that time when I totally did! LOL!!!).

And for the record, I never came close to successfully completing an Eskimo roll. Fortunately for me, I haven’t needed to.

Ben Karlin was the executive producer of “The Daily Show.” His latest book is “Thing I’ve Learned From The 10,000 Men Who Dumped Me” (Grand Central Publishing).

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse ponders New York Magazine’s “Best of New York” Special Double Ish.

Recently, through a series of startling but ultimately mundane machinations we’d rather not get into because it involves that most hideous of modern chimeras (i.e., frequent flier miles), we happened to receive in the mail (we know, gross) a copy of New York Magazine. Though we hadn’t looked at the print version of this in perhaps 100 years, we occasionally like to scroll through The Daily Intel, and so dipped into the “Best of New York” (Special Double Issue) with a sense of curiosity that quickly turned to real fear as we were exposed to the most idiotic, superficial and artless “Best of New York” list imaginable, dominated by upscale mall venues and a cheeky, nostalgic prose designed (we suppose) to make readers think they’re cool. For example, NYM asks us: “Is there anything more heartening than a Sunday-afternoon bagel and lox from Russ and Daughters? Do notes ever sound more intimate than when they’re coming out of a sax at the Jazz Standard? Is any other symbol more evocative than the interlocking N and Y on a Yankees Cap?” Umm, yes, yes and yes? Equally nauseating are the many Brooklyn venues described in the cutest possible terms, e.g., “Homage,” a skateboard shop in Williamsburg where “staffers are quick to learn your name,” and “Pacific Standard,” a “literary bar” with a “frequent drinker program”? Barf.

By this point, we were officially afraid as we remembered that we, too, live in Manhattan and are known for being the best in at least one important category, which led to the following disaster scenario: namely, what if something in our neighborhood was included in this embarrassing list? Would it mean the “end” of Washington Heights, Manhattan’s most forgotten and ruined landscape? Would we suddenly be infiltrated with crass legions of nouveau riches and their Brooklyn-based offspring? (In short: those soulless people on Bravo’s new “hell-avision” show The Real Housewives of New York City?) (Zing!)

Thankfully, the answer is no! (Phew.) Of the 210 (or so) “best of” entries, not a single one came even close to mentioning anything in Washington Heights! Harlem had two entries, but they were both safely south of 125th Street: 1) Soha Style, a modern Bombo-stool-aesthetic store (Zzzzz) on 116th Street and Fifth Avenue (near The Kalahari) and 2) Sundial Schwartz, a mirror-repair shop on 118th in East Harlem. All the rest are safely miles away.

Rejoice in the breakdown:

Manhattan
Downtown/Financial District 5
Chinatown 2
Lower East Side 7
Soho 15
East Village 12
West Village 28
Grammercy/Murray Hill 12
Midtown East 4
Chelsea 5
Hell’s Kitchen 7
Midtown 31
Upper West Side 12
Upper East Side 7
Harlem 2

Brooklyn
Williamsburg 12
Dumbo 4
Ft. Greene 1
Prospect Heights 2
Park Slope 5
Cobble Hill 3
Boerum Hill 3
Brooklyn Heights 1
Red Hook 3
Flatbush 1
Borough Park 1
Ditmas Park 1

Token Gestures
Queens 5
The Bronx 1
Staten Island 2
New Jersey 1
Long Island 1
Connecticut 1
Westchester 1
Internet/Phone 14

159th Street
add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse scores selected opinion pieces in The Times.

Paul Krugman/The Anxiety Election

The Short Version: It’s the economy, stupid.

In his words: “[Democrats] can contrast the Clinton boom with the Bush bust; they can make the case that Republican economic ideology, with its fixation on privatization and deregulation, helped get us into this mess.”

Score: D+ (Dour)
There’s nothing really wrong with this column, but there’s nothing really right about it, either. Anytime a columnist starts parading around USA Today polls to support the obvious, we know we’re in for a long read. Krugman’s continuous whining about Obama is also getting on our nerves.

David Brooks/Playing by Clinton Rules

The Short Version: Obama should not betray the core message of his campaign (which also btw needs to be better defined).

In his words: “As the trench warfare stretches on through the spring, the excitement of Obama-mania will seem like a distant, childish mirage.”

The Score: A- (Astute)
Brooks delivers a lucid analysis of what’s happening to Obama post-Ohio and forcefully makes the case that he’s headed in the wrong direction.

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse — with help from our United Kingdom correspondent, The London Eye — examines life abroad (instead of just dreaming about it all the time).

Today, this exclusive analysis from The London Eye:

“These [statues of Antony Gormley] seem to be naked, and possibly gay, but not necessarily hot …”


(Photo BBC News)

Thanks, London Eye! We completely agree with your incisive analysis, and are sure that it will help clarify the issue for our many American readers who are currently scouring their neighborhoods for statues that are both gay and hot.

The Hot Gay Statue Contest Roundup:

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse reports on life at home.

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse scores selected opinion pieces in The Times.

Gail Collins/Hillary’s Edge

The Short Version: Pennsylvania is the new Ohio.

In her words: “Then comes the kind of convention political reporters have dreamed about since we were little nerds in the third grade writing essays on the electoral college.”

Score: A-(Amusing)
We like this column because — even if it is nerdy — it’s both humorous and self-aware.

Nicholas Kristof/Good News: Karlo Will Live

The Short Version: Foreign aid can work: here’s the evidence.

In his words: “Yet this is a ‘good news’ column. Karlo will live.”

The Score: D (Depressing)
Although we are obviously happy for Karlo and his family, we are depressed by Kristoff’s world view and — most of all — his prose, in which he breaks things down into “good news” and “bad news,” as if we were three-year olds incapable of digesting a piece of real analysis.

Roger Cohen/The Obamas of the World

The Short Version: Obama’s half-sister lives in Kenya–omg!

In his words: “[U]nder the mango trees and beside the chickens poking around, sits Auma Obama, the senator’s older half-sister. She’s the key.”

The Score: D (Draining)
Ugh. Cohen tries to get literary and instead delivers an “animal-in-the-zoo” treatment that resonates with nothing but cheap mysticism and stereotype. Truly embarrassing.

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse thinks about shit on the daily commute.

As we walk through midtown each morning and each afternoon, we often pause to observe a fading silhouette on a wall; while somewhat decrepit, it provides comforting evidence — of a sort we are always on the lookout for — that Andy Warhol did in fact live in New York City. We like to imagine him at this time, some two hundred years ago, when he hovered benevolently (or not) over a most incredible cast of characters. We rummage through a mental list of superstars; we think of Candy Darling, who always beckons to us across the decades like a siren on the shore; we think of Nico, but she’s hardly worth mentioning, enshrined as she is in the history of the Velvet Underground. Nor are we immune to Edie Sedgwick, whose manic and delusional self-destruction is in certain ways unparalleled in the Warhol mythology, given her stark but fragile beauty and the aristocratic heights from which she descended, flitting about Manhattan like a demented pixie. Have you not also read Ciao Manhattan fifty thousand times before growing only slightly fatigued by the descriptions of her incredible vanity, her relentless search for drugs, her childish apathy for money and manners, her love affair — there can be no other word — with Andy, who catered to her every indulgence until she wore him out? Whenever we watch the four Edies in Outer and Inner Space, whispering and murmuring like an eternal bad influence who wished to drive the audience to ever greater extremes, we regret not having ever witnessed even one of her infamous and insouciant entrances into ______ with Warhol and his entourage, where she was said to have ordered one of everything on the menu but left all of it untouched.

But even more than Nico and Edie, or even Jackie Curtis or Holly Woodlawn or Andrea Feldman — all of whom we’ve watched in rapture while considering the immortal decadence in which Warhol preserved them — we remain most infatuated with Candy Darling. Over and over we watch her scene in Flesh, where in a display of politesse, she — accompanied by a sadly beatific Jackie Curtis — peruses an old movie magazine, revealing a true passion for her art that transcends the most base but compelling urge to observe a blow-job being delivered to Joe Dallesandro by the topless and deliciously vacant Geri Miller, less than three feet away. Nobody’s obsession and adulation for the past could ever surpass Candy Darling’s; as much as anyone before or since, Candy Darling managed to magically disavow all of her animal instincts, even, or especially, the one for life. We recall the photograph of her in the hospital, taken only weeks before her death, when she was more beautiful than ever, the sickly pallor of her skin somehow luminescent against the cruel and sterile white of the sheets and drooping roses surrounding her. We remember the hours we spent considering her gaze along with the words she wrote at the time: “Even with all my friends and my career on the upswing I feel too empty to go on in this unreal existence. I am just so bored by everything.” Initially we could not have imagined something more tragic and callow, the words of an insolent teenager, until we remember seeing Marlene Dietrich in Dishonored — when distant and defiant, she lifts her veil just prior to execution — and it occurred to us that this was the role Candy Darling adopted for her life, that her eyes were haunted by the same cerebral and pessimistic desire to inhabit another time better than the one in which she was so sadly imprisoned. That Dietrich herself died a recluse — like Garbo, the two women who had clearly most influenced Candy Darling — could hardly be a coincidence. Is there anyone worth knowing who does not understand the desire to escape humanity? We feel we have lived enough, and now have no choice but to resign ourselves to the past.

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse scores selected opinion pieces in The Times.

Maureen Dowd/Duel of Historical Guilts

The Short Version: Let’s not get so caught up in identity politics.

In his words: “As it turns out, making history is actually a way of being imprisoned by history.”

Score: A- (Astute)
Dowd writes with conviction and clarity in this column about the stupidity of those in the Clinton and Obama camps who are foaming at the mouth over a) any African-American who votes for Clinton, or b) any woman who votes for Obama. Although we still prefer Obama — mostly for aesthetic reasons — we agree with 19-year-old Allison Krolczyk, who Dowd writes about: “[Krolczyk] was leaning toward Obama and felt no gender guilt about voting for him. ‘Not at all,’ she said. ‘I think they’re both pretty amazing.'” Kick it, Allison! We know exactly how you feel.

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse runs a contest. Sort of.

We are extremely pleased to announce that we’ve already received our first hot-gay-statue submission, from Andrew of 801a.info, who tells us: “This is in Washington D.C., directly across from the White House. The pictures could be taken to look more salacious, I guarantee.”

Really? We’re not so sure! Given the setting, we think these pix are very salacious, indeed. It’s not hard to imagine presidents and senior-level staffers hungrily peering (with binoculars, behind curtains) at the statuary in question, just before planning their next attack against the gays. But let’s not digress, here are the pix:

There’s definitely instruction happening here: we’re just not so sure it’s “military.”

Let’s make it official: These gay statues are hot. DC is now in the running.

Thanks for kicking things off on a perfect note, Andrew. We look forward to posting more submissions throughout the election season. Clearly there are gay statues out there, but the question remains: which city has the hottest ones?

For rules and guidelines on The Hot Gay Statue Contest, click here.

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse poses a question to a condominium development in Harlem.

Yesterday Curbed posted an update (via Joe Schumacher) on the Kalahari, a controversial — aesthetically speaking — condominium development on 116th Street in Central Harlem that appears to be nearing completion. We recently observed the Kalahari on a field trip to the area, and although we too were underwhelmed by the “tribal” motif on the facade and the somewhat clunky design of the building/s as a whole, we were — more than anything — pretty freakin’ stoked by the presence of a head shop right next door! Oddly, however, this most excellent retail opportunity is not mentioned on the official Kalahari web site, although they talk a lot about the surrounding neighborhood in terms of “community” and provide prospective buyers with a list of close to 30 shops all considered “points of interest.”

What gives, Kalahari? The Head Shop is literally just steps away! Conspiracy or oversight? We provide the evidence below: you be the judge!

Photo 1: The Kalahari from Fifth Avenue. It’s actually past the arch, about halfway down the block.

Photo 2: The Kalahari front view (this photo is from Joe Schumacher’s Neighborhood Watch). Note the storefronts to the right: could one of them be a head shop?

Photo 3: The Head Shop! Why doesn’t the Kalahari mention this outstanding retailer on its site?

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse agrees with a reader.

As regular readers know, we recently took a field trip to Harlem, which led us to make the case that the city should “aggressively” rezone 125th Street. Of the many responses we received — some of which (as expected) were caustic to the point of incoherence (but whatever dude, thanks for the link!) — here is the one that struck us as the most reasonable:

Dear TGR: Your article was tough but yes development is needed as long as it’s responsible. I urge you to also get the official responses from all three Community Boards on the re-zoning of 125th Street. CB9 (West Harlem) and CB11 (East Harlem) voted yes with conditions. CB10 (Central Harlem) voted no with conditions. Nonetheless, the conditions are pretty consistent. Some are “in scope” and some suggest that City Planning will consider what’s called “follow-up actions.” One of the conditions is a local business requirement that would provide certain advantages to encourage the inclusion of new minority-owned businesses in any development scheme. Also, we are pushing for something very unique, which is a “cultural bonus” as an incentive for developers versus the “arts and entertainment” requirement, which is too vague. (The city seems to be supporting this recommendation, which was initially put forth by the 125th Street Business Improvement District and Barbara Askins.) This way local cultural organizations would have an opportunity to get space and bring more vitality to the strip that would support more restaurants, which everyone agrees is needed. We also support consistent streetscaping along all of 125th Street — trees, lighting, trash receptacles, benches that would make 125th Street look more attractive and open; we also recommend a see-through gate requirement so it wouldn’t look so dark. These are some of the additional requests local folks are asking for. And ordinary citizens can still send letters to Amanda Burden. The vote is Monday, March 10th. Send letters directly to Amanda Burden, 22 Reade Street, NYC 10007. Afterwards flood the City Council particularly Councilwoman Melinda Katz, Inez Dickens and Councilman Tony Avella. Hope you and your uptown readers will consider and send letters.

Savona Bailey-McClain

Thanks Savona! (Btw, the bolding was Savona’s, not ours.) We couldn’t agree more, particularly with the part about ordinary (and uptown!) citizens getting involved. (And for the record, we are most definitely ordinary to the extent that we hold no political office, although we sometimes like to think of ourselves as extraordinary, e.g., “we are extraordinary gardeners” or “we have extraordinary appetites when it comes to donuts.”) Seriously, we look forward to seeing how the vote turns out on March 10 and hope — for your sake as well as ours — that it leads to a refurbished 125th Street. Naturally, we will keep our readers apprised of the situation as developments warrant.

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse scores selected opinion pieces in The Times.

Bob Herbert/The $2 Trillion Nightmare

The Short Version: In financial terms, the war in Iraq is not cheap.

In his words: “The Bush administration has tried its best to conceal the horrendous costs of the war.”

Score: A-
Herbert delivers a column that resonates with truth, in prose that is for the most part direct and persuasive (yes, we were shocked, too); we have no problem believing that the costs of the Iraq war will be with us for quite some time, no matter how big the economy grows. Our only minor quibble with Herbert’s column is his unnecessary jab at Saturday Night Live, along with the implication that Americans are too preoccupied with the “fun” side of politics; this makes Herbert seem out of touch with the internet, where its understood that information and entertainment and — yes! — substantive political argument can be delivered in one package.

David Brooks/A Defining Moment

The Short Version: Even though I’m a conservative, I love Obama.

In his words: “Obama sounded like a cross between a social activist and a flannel-shirted software C.E.O. — as a nonhierarchical, collaborative leader who can inspire autonomous individuals to cooperate for the sake of common concerns.”

The Score: B (Benign)
Brooks gets a bit misty describing Obama’s appeal (and contrasting it with Clinton’s approach). There’s nothing particularly illuminating here, but Brooks writes cohesively and even lyrically; at moments like this we wish that he would just come out as a gay man progressive liberal.

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse mixes pleasure and politics.

Today — in what we can now confirm was the biggest day ever at The Gay Recluse (from a traffic-whore perspective) — we had the pleasure of having Dan Savage link to our smokin’ hot gay-statue contest. We encourage you to check out the full post on Slog (“Strike a Pose“), which — if you’re not familiar with it — has many times led us to fantasize about moving to Seattle. Be sure to enjoy the comments, which run the gamut from hilariously annoying to sadly self-hating to righteously bitchy. (That said, we’ll let you connect those particular dots.) Thanks to Savage, we’ve already received some great statue pix, which we will post soon.

Moving away from statues, we also wanted to take this opportunity to officially endorse Dan Savage as our choice for vice-president of the United States. Ok, stop rolling your eyes if you think we’re endorsing him just because he was kind enough to promote our statue contest. A careful examination of the record will reveal several instances in which we made similar comments around the blogosphere to the same effect, not because we had any particular hope of currying his favor, but because we think he would be better than 99 percent of current office holders, particularly those with access to the Oval Office. (Plus, Curbed also linked to the statue post, and we’re not endorsing them for vice-president, although frankly we wouldn’t mind seeing a few of those guys on the city council.)

Regular readers of The Gay Recluse know that we’ve already endorsed Barack Obama for president (after giving up on Geraldine Ferraro and — our longstanding but secret wish — Janice Dickinson), but whoever gets the nod — even Hillary Clinton, who we also support, just not as much as Obama — would be smart to put Dan Savage at the top of his or her shortlist of potential running mates. It could be the difference between between a Democratic victory and another four years of _____!

Consider the assets/demographics Savage brings to the table:

  • Proven asshole-Republican slayer (ask Rick Santorum)
  • Knows what a blog is (the youth vote, omg!)
  • Gay (the gay vote)
  • Family guy (the soccer-mom vote, lol)
  • Likes cities (the urban vote)
  • Environmentally conscious (the idiots-who-voted-for-Nader-in-2000 vote, wtf)
  • Admits when he’s made a mistake (the progressive vote)
  • Has a heart (the liberal vote)
  • Tough (the blue-collar vote)
  • Immune to scandal (the dipshit-independent vote)
  • Good on television (the television vote)

Seriously, could anyone else be better situated on the Democratic ticket? Who would you rather have go head-to-head with whatever asshole Republican John McCain has at his side? John Edwards? Al Gore? Mayor Bloomberg? That idiot from New Mexico who said sexual orientation was a choice (to a gay audience)? Dodd? Biden? Zzzzzzzzzzzz. No thanks to all of the above.

Listen up, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton! Here’s your chance to buck conventional wisdom: choose Dan Savage as your running mate this summer and reap the rewards with a landslide victory in November. Our fucked-up country awaits your decision: for once, make it a good one.

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse scores selected opinion pieces in The Times.

Paul Krugman/Deliverance or Diversion

The Short Version: Why did Obama have to come along and wreck everything?

In his words: “Some progressives are appalled by the direction their party seems to have taken: they wanted another F.D.R., yet feel that they’re getting an oratorically upgraded version of Michael Bloomberg instead.”

Score: C- (Crybaby)
Krugman spends an entire column whining about Obama distracting from the “real” message, which is the miserable condition of the country after being run by Bush & Company for 40 years. The “electability” argument he parrots — i.e., that Obama hasn’t been “tested” yet — strikes us as the opposite of progressive (to say the least) and leaves us longing to set this column aside, even before we’ve finished reading.

William Kristol/The Indispensable Man

The Short Version: Bill Buckley, my hero.

In his words: “It’s hard today to appreciate that before Buckley, there was no American conservative movement.”

The Score: F (Forgotten)
Buckley died a thousand years ago, so this appreciation feels beyond stale. (Leaving aside that the country Buckley left behind is a fucking mess.) Complete waste of space.

Roger Cohen/African Genocide Averted

The Short Version: Kofi Annan saves Kenya.

In his words: “I see Annan’s persistence as a reminder of how shallow Bush administration peace pursuits have been, with the exception of Christopher Hill’s North Korean labors.”

The Score: D (Doubtful)
Although we’re obviously happy to hear that Kenya is calming down, this column bugs us for two reasons: 1) we don’t trust Cohen, who has repeatedly demonstrated that he is capable of the most superficial brand of shallow-thinking optimism, particularly in the context of foreign relations, and 2) we don’t buy into the idea that one person — or in Cohen’s worldview, a clique of globetrotting diplomats — has (or should have) the responsibility of negotiating the fate of thousands; if this is in fact true, it raises questions that in the long term are just as disturbing as those it answers.

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse sponsors a competition. Sort of.

After our recent post about the smokin’ hot statuary on Audubon Terrace in Washington Heights, a reader wrote to ask if we were aware of other such collections, particularly in the United States, where — in case you haven’t noticed — the puritanical impulse runs pretty deep. Frankly, we have no idea! Hence, we have decided to sponsor a competition to determine which Stateside neighborhood has the the most smokin’ hot statuary: the way we look at it, Washington Heights is pretty much at the top of the mountain unless or until we are knocked off.

The rules:

  • The statues must be in (at least) a quasi-public place — as opposed to a private collection — in which members of the general public can observe the statuary in question without paying an admission fee.
  • The statues must be in the United States (because everyone knows Europe is basically overflowing with hot gay statues); that said, we won’t discourage our European readers (or anyone else) from submitting snaps, although you obviously won’t be eligible for the top designation.
  • Statues of either gender are acceptable, but we expect photographs to be taken with a “gay eye” and we will judge entries accordingly.
  • Obviously, the statues must be smokin’ hot.

Got it? Send pix to us at thegayrecluse[at]gmail.com and we will post the best ones (or for that matter, even the mediocre ones). The winner — if there even is one, given that we don’t expect anywhere to seriously challenge Audubon Terrace/Washington Heights — will be announced at the end of 2008. Or maybe sooner. Election night, to distract us from the pain? Who knows. We look forward to hearing from you.

Can you do better than this? We’d like to see you try.

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse unveils the hidden assets of Washington Heights.

For those of you who have grown fatigued by the unceasing onslaught of “hot” photographs, videos and movie clips featuring live male actors and models, why not take a trip to Audubon Terrace in Washington Heights? Here you can reconnect with 5000 years of civilization, a period of history (or so it has been widely reported) during which 1) the internet didn’t exist and 2) neither did cell-phone cameras (!). Commissioned in the early 1900s by Archer Milton Huntington (founder of the equally beautiful Hispanic Society, which owns the statues and the terrace on which they are located) and sculpted by his wife Anna Hyatt Huntington (wtf?), these statues offer a staggeringly wide array of choices for the modern palette. Whatever was going on with Arthur and Anna (we have our theories), we owe them a debt of gratitude for providing future generations with such an exceedingly fine collection of smokin’ hot statuary (if not quite the Barberini Faun). We present just a few here:


Hot sword.


Another view of the hilt.


A hot dad.


Nice six for an older guy.


Hot twink in a tunic.


Into diapers?


Hot group sex.


Hot bears.


Woof.

The Hot Gay Statue round-up:

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse scores selected opinion pieces in The Times.

Frank Rich/McCain Channels His Inner Hillary

The Short Version: Like Clinton, McCain cannot escape his support of the Iraq war, which is a losing proposition with the electorate.

In his words: “The good news for the Democrats so far is that whatever Mr. McCain’s sporadic overlap with liberals, he is emulating almost identically the suicidal Clinton campaign against Mr. Obama. ”

Score: B+ (Bitchy)
Rich is effective once he drops the tired Hillary Clinton bashing — along with the ridiculous assertion that there’s not much difference between the two, politically — and focuses his attention on John McCain and his weaknesses (dated, white, Republican, hawk) vis-a-vis Barack Obama.

Nicholas Kristof/Africa’s Next Slaughter

The Short Version: Sudan is on the brink of war again.

In his words: “So remember this little town of Abyei. It’s the tinderbox for Africa’s next war, which will probably resemble Darfur but be carried out on a much wider scale.”

The Score: D (Depressing)
Kristof gives us the latest on Sudan and though we don’t disagree with anything he says, we long for more psychological insight into a situation that seems to repeat itself over and over and over and over. (Note to Bob Herbert: we cut-and-pasted this verbatim from one of our old columns.)

Maureen Dowd/A Wake-Up Call for Hillary

The Short Version: Hillary should wake up to how much I hate her.

In her words: “It’s rather Mommie Dearest for the first serious female contender to try to give the kiddies nightmares.”

The Score: B+ (Bitchy)
Dowd subjects Clinton to the usual treatment here, but for once we agree she (Clinton) deserves it, given the stupidity of her campaign’s recent terrorist ad.

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse becomes increasingly obsessed with The George Washington Bridge.

Time and Date of photograph: March 1, 2008, 5:58pm.

Notes: A panoramic view of the pre-war ruins of Washington Heights and the post-war ruins of New Jersey.

“The George Washington Bridge over the Hudson is the most beautiful bridge in the world. Made of cables and steel beams, it gleams in the sky like a reversed arch. It is blessed. It is the only seat of grace in the disordered city. It is painted an aluminum color and, between water and sky, you see nothing but the bent cord supported by two steel towers. When your car moves up the ramp the two towers rise so high that it brings you happiness; their structure is so pure, so resolute, so regular that here, finally, steel architecture seems to laugh. The car reaches an unexpectedly wide apron; the second tower is very far away; innumerable vertical cables, gleaming against the sky, are suspended from the magisterial curve which swings down and then up. The rose-colored towers of New York appear, a vision whose harshness is mitigated by distance.”

– Le Corbusier, When the Cathedrals Were White, 1947.

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank