In which The Gay Recluse plays Abstract Jeopardy.

Readers! Welcome to our new feature, Abstract Jeopardy, in which we pose one possible solution but leave the question open to debate. Let’s get started, shall we?

Today’s possible solution: 50,000 red geraniums.

So what’s the question?

A few possibilities:

  • What is 100,000 geraniums minus 50,000 geraniums?
  • You know what’s more impressive than your begonias?
  • We heard you’re afraid of red flowers: what is the scariest thing you can imagine?
  • Hey, what’s inside that quanza hut?
  • If you could see one thing before you close your eyes tonight, what would it be?

In which The Gay Recluse is small.

Time/Location of Pictures: 35th Street between Madison and Fifth Avenue, some night last week.

It’s not exactly a revelation to say that the city is filled with infinite borders, many of which are strictly maintained.

But there’s something comforting in the utility of a nicely designed fence.

As we walk past we trail our hand along, hitting each bar the way we used to do as a child.

Even now — when we are old enough to know better — we are sometimes hypnotized by the illusion of possibility.


In which The Gay Recluse scores selected opinions in The Times.

Bob Herbert/Overkill and Short Shrift

The Short Version: Why can’t we get a grip?

In his words: “The challenge for the working press right now is to see if we can force ourselves past the overwhelming temptations of Wright and race and focus in a sustained way on some other important matters, like the cratering economy, metastasizing energy costs, the dismal state of public education, the nation’s crumbling infrastructure or the damage being done to the American soul by the endless war in Iraq.”

Score: D (Dated)
Herbert drones on about the usual stuff, which is problematic because 1) his prose is fatigued, 2) he ignores the reality that most people don’t read traditional news outlets anymore, and 3) appealing to our higher instincts is not going to win any races, which is to say we are all whores for something and Herbert would sound more credible if he just admitted it.

Gail Collins/Indiana Holiday

The Short Version: Let’s all take a gas-tax holiday!

In her words: “The point is particularly piquant when made by a guy who flies around the country in his wife’s private plane.”

The Score: A- (Amusing)
Although these are not exactly moving targets, Collins nails the Maverick and Clinton quite nicely on their hilarious gas-tax holiday proposals. Better yet, though Obama clearly looks better on the gas-tax front, we get the sense that Collins will happily support Obama or Clinton in the general election, which is pretty much how we’re looking at things these days.


In which The Gay Recluse updates his informal but rather telling quantitative analysis of Modern Love, the weekly Style Section (of The Times) column in which openly gay writers almost never appear, and even less frequently describe a romantic relationship.

This week’s piece: Want To Be My Boyfriend? Please Define
by Marguerite Fields

Subject: In the first winner of the collegiate Modern Love, a somewhat tortured, straight lady/youth has trouble finding a long-term relationship, however you want to define it. Reading it, we were sad to note the writer’s almost perverse desperation to conform to an ideal that — as far as we can tell — has never existed outside of Hollywood. She writes: “I still want to believe that two people can meet and like each other well enough to stay together exclusively, without the introduction of some 1960s rhetoric about free love or other noncommittal slogans.” We’re not disagreeing with her, but — when taken in the context of the rest of the piece — we were struck by the somewhat joyless manner in which she approaches the task, as if finding such a relationship is a question of tediously sifting through the paint chips until you find the perfect color with which you can live happily ever after. But she’s young and earnest, so we’re rooting for her! Anyway, for our gay version of the piece, in which we hope she can enjoy herself a bit more along the way, click here.

Filed under: Straight Woman on “Looking”

The updated tally (or why we feel like animals in the zoo): 7 out of 177 columns by openly gay writers; 2 out of 177 on female gay relationships; 0 out of 177 on male gay relationships. In what is arguably the “gayest” section of The Times, more women have written about gay men than gay men have.

Straight Woman on Relationships iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii ii (42)
Straight Woman on Family iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii (35)
Straight Woman on “Looking for Love” iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii (35)
Straight Woman on Breaking Up iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iii (23)
Straight Man on Relationships iiiii iiiii i (11)
Straight Man on Breakup iiiiii (6)
Straight Woman on Gay Men iiiii i (6)
Straight Man on Family iiiii i(6)
Straight Man on “Looking for Love” iiiii (5)
Gay Man on Family ii (2)
Gay Woman on Relationship ii (2)
Gay Woman on Family i (1)
Gay Man on Self-Hatred i (1)
Gay Man on Prom Date i (1)
Ambiguous/Nurse on Drugs i (1)



In which The Gay Recluse hopes that a young woman will not succumb to the more conventional pressures that sadly ooze from this week’s Modern Love offering in The Times. Those looking for our quantitative analysis should click here.

Want To Be My Girlfriend? Please Don’t Define

By MARGUERITE FIELDS and THE GAY RECLUSE

RECENTLY my mother asked me to clarify what I meant when I said I was dating someone, versus when I was hooking up with someone, versus when I was seeing someone. And I had trouble answering her because the many options overlap and blur in my mind. But at one point, four years ago, I had a girlfriend. And I know she was my girlfriend because she said, “I want you to be my girlfriend,” and I said, “O.K.”

She and I dated for over a year, and when we broke up I thought my angsty heart was going to spit itself right up out of my sore throat. Afterward, I moved out of my mother’s house in Brooklyn and into an apartment in the East Village, and from there it becomes confusing.

So, a few days after the chat with my mom, when I found myself downtown drinking tea with my friend Steven, I asked him what he thought about dating. He has a long-term boyfriend, and I was curious how he viewed their relationship. It was pretty depressing.

“The main thing,” he offered a bit too earnestly, so I knew he was about to lie,“is I don’t mind if he sleeps with other people. I mean, he’s not my property, right? I’m just glad I get to hang out with him. Spend time with him. Because that’s all we really have, you know? I don’t want him to be mine, and I don’t want to be anybody’s.”

I tried not to laugh as I sucked my teeth and looked over at the next table, where two rather hot ladies sat opposite each other. One looked over her shoulder and gave me a closed-mouth grin. Man was I at the wrong table!

But Steven droned on, explaining that it’s not a question of faithfulness but of expectation. He can’t be expected not to want to sleep with other people, so he can’t expect his boyfriend to think differently. They are both young and living in New York, and as everyone in New York knows, there’s the possibility of meeting anyone, everywhere, all the time. Ugh, is there anything worse than a gay man droning on about an open relationship?

Me, I’ve “dated” a lot of girls. It’s not that I’ve gone out anywhere with a lot of these girls, or been physical with every single one of them, or even seen them more than once. But there have been many, many encounters.

I’ve met girls in the park, at the deli, at galleries, at parties and on the Internet. The Internet idea came from thinking that if I could sift through people’s profiles, like applications, I could eliminate the sads and the mads, the crazies and the lunatics.

That didn’t work out so well. One crazy sad leaned across the table an hour into dinner and screamed: “You love me! I know you do!” Another stood outside my apartment with one finger on the buzzer and another covering the peephole, occasionally banging her fist, until she finally exhausted herself and left.

As for the girls I first met in person, there was the construction-worker lady I ran into on the train twice before saying anything, kissed the third time, kissed the fourth time, got stood up by the fifth time and never saw again. Sigh. She was hot. Then there was the girl with tattooed knuckles, the young Republican (ew), the Irish chick on vacation (fun!) and that crazy bitch who stole like $300 from me to buy drugs (and didn’t give me any – lol!). There was the activist, the actor, the librarian, the waiter and the lady bond trader. Hot, kinda hot, not so hot and seriously hot (and bonus: rich, too!).

So when my friends and I started having a conversation about the nature of monogamy, I claimed to know something about monogamy. Because, despite the fleeting nature of most of my encounters, and despite my own role in their short duration, I think what I have been seeking in some form from all of these women is permanence.

Sometimes I don’t like them, or am scared of them, and a lot of times I’m just bored by them. But my fear or dislike or boredom never seems to diminish my underlying desire for a girl to stay, or at least to say she is going to stay, for a very long time.

And even when I don’t want her to stay — even when she and I find each other as strangers and remain strangers until we stop doing “whatever” it is we are doing — I have this Hollywood-conventional desire to believe that two people can meet and like each other well enough to stay together exclusively, without the introduction of some 1960s rhetoric about free love or other noncommittal slogans. Like the opposite of my dumb friend Steven.

But! Noncommittal is what we’re all about.

There was the girl with red hair and big steaklike hands who walked with me arm in arm through Washington Square Park, kissed me on the stoop of my mother’s brownstone and said she wanted to be my girlfriend. Until our next walk, when she kept her hands to herself and said she meant girlfriend “in the theoretical sense of the word.”

“How about if I theoretically punch you in the nose?” I muttered to her back as she walked away.

Then there was the installer of soy insulation who cooked soggy pasta and made me watch football (Zzzzz) and whimpered and kicked in her sleep. In the spring there was the lady 12 years older than me who shared an apartment overlooking Tompkins Square Park with an antediluvian fossil who – ew – walked around in graying long underwear.

There was the girl who wore even more makeup than I did, and the one who waxed her eyebrows clean off her face. And the one who slept with a guy when she was drunk, then with another when she was sober. (But she insisted she wasn’t straight, just curious, and since when was I so uptight anyway? I was so outta there!)

Over the summer there was the Catholic chick who said she wanted to be nun but who stopped calling after I said I wouldn’t sleep with her on our first date. In the fall, back at school, there was the banjo player from the woods of New England who took me home to meet her family, then moved away and told me to wait for her. And I did, for months, until she called to say she was falling in love with me, and oh, man, I had to come see her right away (“Buy your ticket tonight!”), before she called again to say it was moving too fast and she wasn’t ready.

And on, and on, and on. OMG, why do I attract such sads and crazies?

Then this winter I met a girl while waiting to have my computer fixed. She had big blue eyes and a wide red mouth and delicate hands and greasy brown hair. She sat down and asked what I was reading and did I have a girlfriend because she was asking me out. She smelled like incense and clean linen, and I was overwhelmingly and instantaneously smitten. Among other things, I liked her indifference, confidence and knowledge of foreign film directors.

On our first date she explained her theory of exclusive relationships, which was that they shouldn’t exist. (Uh-oh!) We talked about our (and all of our friends’) divorced parents, about how marriage was nothing but a pragmatic financial venture, and about the last time we cheated on someone. She said that her disregard for monogamy wasn’t a chauvinistic throwback, but quite the opposite: the ultimate nod to feminism. I would have left then, but she was a hot chick so I just covered my ears and thought about the night ahead.

On our second date (I know) we watched coverage of the Iowa caucus, and later, after listening to jazz at her apartment, she crawled onto her bed, leaned against the headboard and said she didn’t burn artificial light after dark. I was like “wow, you really are the most pretentious person ever!” but I sighed and edged into bed next to her.

During the night she kicked and snored, grabbing greedily at me with her well-moisturized hands like a child snatching at free candy.

We overslept. In the morning I watched her dress frantically, the way a drifter would, or maybe Annie Hall (gray pants and shirt tucked in and tie and vest and brown wingtip shoes and gray sweater and red scarf and jacket: it was lovely). She looked up occasionally from her scrambling to give a big toothy smile. I made the bed and drank the orange juice she bought for me the night before. We left her apartment and tried to find a cab.

As we crossed Hudson Street, we waded through a passing stream of preschool children walking in pairs, holding hands. I watched their (frankly hot) lady-teachers — one at the front of the line, one in the middle, one at the back — while she hailed a taxi.

A week passed before I saw her again. I was about to go back to school in Vermont, and she was headed to homophobic Jamaica on vacation, which should tell you something. When I entered the restaurant, she said: “The nice part about having a shoddy memory is I forget how pretty some people are. You look beautiful.” Part of me was like “barf” but it was kinda sweet, too: she was being romantic.

As we ate, we theorized about the effects of pornography on romantic relationships. We both agreed that porn can be OK once in a while, but anyone who’s like really into it is kinda creepy. Dinner ended; she had to go pack for her trip. I asked casually when I was going to see her again.

She sighed. “That’s a loaded question.”

I asked wtf she meant, because I thought the question was fairly straightforward.

Then omg it came. The story. The long, boring, aggravatingly rehearsed and condescending story. It spewed, overflowed and dripped off our table and onto the floor and underneath the shoes of the other patrons and into the street. It was a superfund site.

She said she had just gotten out of a long relationship, and now she was single and didn’t really know how this whole dating thing works, but she was seeing a lot of other people, and she liked me; she thought I was “special.” Cross my heart, she actually called me special. Meanwhile, I was counting the squares on our tablecloth.

WHEN she was done, she asked: “That’s what you were talking about, right? Seeing me again and the nature of our relationship? Like, what are we to each other?”

I said I just meant to ask when we were going to literally “see” – I even used the rabbit ears” each other again, because I thought that was the polite thing to do after a few dates, and I wondered if she wanted to make time for me to come back to New York to “see” her. And she said no, that was “too much, too soon,” but if I’m ever in town I should call her. She would love to see me. Whatever!

We left. It was raining, she hailed a cab for me, and we hugged for like a fraction of a second without looking at each other. I got into the cab and rode away. Phew.

And tried to process it. And tried to remind myself that when we first met I thought she was an arrogant, presumptuous-but-hot lady. Plus omg the whole candle-burning thing! For some reason I though about the conversation with my dumb friend Steven. He would tell me that I was supposed to actively practice some Zenlike form of nonattachment, that no one is my property and neither am I theirs, and so I should just enjoy the time we spend together, because in the end it’s our collected experiences that add up to a rich and fulfilling life. Barf. I tried to tell myself that I’m young, that this is the time to be casual, careless, lighthearted and fun; don’t ruin it. Most of all, I told myself not to listen to the sorry “sadults” who want me to define everything so that it will nicely fit into their own depressing lives.

When I got out of the cab, I popped into a Second Avenue deli to grab a drink and spotted a tall redhead whose eyes were exactly the right shade of earnest brown. My heart melted when she moved a few feet over and asked what I was buying. I winked at her and we laughed, knowing that we were about to embark on something undefinable – like who cares what it’s called? – but sweet, something that for these few seconds was filled with the potential of the city street in spring, which just a few feet away glowed with the russet hues of a setting sun about to give way to the night. And I smiled, knowing that this was more than enough.

Marguerite Fields is a junior at Marlboro College in Vermont.


In which The Gay Recluse admires manholes.

Time/Location: May 2, 2008 on 35th Street between 6th Avenue and Madison.

By our calculations, there are approximately ten zillion manholes in New York City, and each has a cover; this is one of the largest and most striking. The alternating pattern of single and interlocking circles — reminiscent of an ancient calendar of some lost civilization — does not fail to hypnotize, and even the font strikes us as understated, dignified and heroic. We wish all manhole covers could be so striking!

This one, by contrast, seems rather austere and corporate. The logo depresses us.

Here’s another antique verson, which we carbon-dated to the year 1438, when the city was first wired for electricity.

Seriously, how awesome is this pattern? Imagine how much better almost any building facade would look if painted like this. We think of all the dumb things hanging in museums and wonder why this has been left to disintegrate under the asphalt.

Someone recently tried to insist that every manhole is round. Au contraire, my friend!

We like these sewer treatments.

No shame here, either!

This manhole cover is thought to be almost two thousand years old.

Here’s another of the extra-large manholes. Sadly, this exquisite manhole cover seems to have sustained some damage, so it will probably not last more than 1000 years.


In which The Gay Recluse scores selected opinions in The Times.

Paul Krugman/Party of Denial

The Short Version: I still love Hillary even if she supports that stupid gas-tax holiday.

In his words: “But if the Democrats really want to pin the denialist label on John McCain, health care is the place to focus.”

Score: D+ (Desultory)
Krugman delivers a very unfocused column here, beginning with some whining about what Obama could have said better on his Fox News interview and then moving into some obvious points about how the Republicans are vulnerable on just about everything before finishing with an admission that Clinton’s gas-tax holiday proposal was a disappointment but that she’s still better than Obama, just because Krugman says so.

David Brooks/The Cognitive Age

The Short Version: Technology, not globalization, is what’s driving economic change in the world today.

In his words: “If you understand that you are living at the beginning of a cognitive age, you’re focusing on the real source of prosperity and understand that your anxiety is not being caused by a foreigner. ”

The Score: C- (Corporate)
What we like about this column is that Brooks conveys the reality that the world these days is ruled by corporations, and not countries. But unlike Brooks (and most of his Republican brethren), we’re not big believers in corporations (which is not to say we’re fans of nationalism, either) who are obviously the driving force behind the technological revolution Brooks describes. Like Brooks we tend to laugh at Democratic politicians who like to rally the troops with cheap talk of roping in globalization, but unlike Brooks, we also laugh at the Republicans who like to pretend that corporations are the answer to everything. The other thing we didn’t like about this column is Brooks’ needless reliance on academic jargon: if words like “cognitive” and “narrative” (in a political context) aren’t bad enough, does he really need to use “paradigm” NINE TIMES in a single column? 


In which The Gay Recluse attempts to use a new “macro” lens.

So yeah: The Globularia stygia we bought last year at Stonecrop Gardens is in bloom.

These first two pix we took with the regular lens.

Then we took some drugs tried out a new macro lens.

We are reminded of a record cover for one of those shoegazer bands we used to love: My Bloody Valentine and Ride were our favorites, but we also liked the Pale Saints and Lush.

Of all of these bands, My Bloody Valentine now seems by far the most prophetic.

With Loveless they both summed up 30 years of what had come before and predicted 30 years of what would come after.

It’s no wonder it was the last thing they did; sometimes it seems as if they left an entire generation reeling.

Maybe if they were still making LPs, they would consider our photograph for the cover.


In which The Gay Recluse attempts to reconcile his traffic-whoring impulses with a desire to flee the crazies.  

In March, as part of a new traffic-whoring initiative, we opened up The Gay Recluse to commenters. By and large we’ve been very pleased with the results, not only in terms of traffic but in terms of the many new friends we’ve made. Hello, new friends!

Not surprisingly, we’ve have also been occasionally treated to less enlightened commenters, such as  Reader Kurt, who introduced himself to us with this:

I was unaware that gay meant intellectually deficient.

And then became even crazier when we pointed out the equating “gay” to “intellectual deficiency” was a wee bit homophobic. Here’s what he said:

I asked Greg, Bobby, Amanda and Becky, and they all laughed at your outrage. I have twice as many gay friends as straight. I picked the adjective in your blog name because it was grammatically simpler than to use the noun. To restate: I didn’t know “recluse” meant idiot. Is that better?

As much as we (a la Gawker) would like to execute more-stupid-than-funny commenters, we will continue to “allow” them to post because a) LOL! and b) we’re traffic whores. But for future reference, if you’re going to act like an idiot, please don’t be shocked when we laugh at you and say: ha! ha! look at the out-of-control idiot who obviously needs at least ten years on the nearest therapy couch! (And god help his kids!) And then maybe we’ll shed a few tears, because we know what it’s like to be angry and disillusioned and to want to take this out on the world around you instead of looking at what you’ve done and admitting that it was wrong (and we’re not talking about a stupid comment, obviously). And then maybe we’ll go look at some smokin’ hot gay statues and feel a lot better.

 


In which The Gay Recluse scores selected opinions in The Times.

Gail Collins/How Will It Play in Apex?

The Short Version: It’s hard to say who’s worse: Blabbermouth Bill or The Reverend Wright.

In her words: “On the other hand, young voters who have yet to have their hearts broken by a politician find it wicked (sic?) depressing.”

Score: A (Applause)
We like this column because Collins humorously riffs on a lot of media fluff, but in a reflective and resigned manner that avoids being overwrought or overbearing. Plus we love that Collins wrote “wicked depressing,” which reminds us of going up to Boston as a kid, when all of our cousins used to say everything was “wicked” this or “wicked” that.

Nicholas Kristof/Can We Be as Smart as Bats?

The Short Version: We’re destroying the rain forests.

In his words: “Somewhere in the world, we humans cut down an area of jungle the size of a football field every second of every day, and deforestation now contributes as much to global warming as all the carbon emitted by the United States. ”

The Score: D (Depressing)
We don’t disagree with anything Kristof says about the cool things the two guys running the eco-lodge in Ecuador are doing (though we still want to know if they’re gay!) but we are too fatigued by the pedantic, scolding tone of the piece to do much but feel relieved when we finally reach the end and put it aside. We also don’t enjoy being told the same facts in consecutive columns, e.g., Sunday: “More than half of the world’s tropical rain forest is already gone, and every second of every day, another football-field-size chunk is destroyed,” which comes off as rather too cut-and-pasty (same problem with featuring the same slide show in two consecutive columns.)


In which The Gay Recluse says goodbye to the cruelest month.

Our hands were shaking a little bit, here. (It’s been a tough few weeks, hasn’t it?)


In which The Gay Recluse reports on monthly traffic whoring metrix to the Board of Directors.

I. Summary
After a record month of whoring in March, we experienced a slight dip in April. But! It was still our second best month on record.

II. Traffic Whoring Metrix
WordPress
Total Views March: 13,957
Grand Total Number of Views: 48,973
Monthly Breakdown

  • September: 68
  • October: 1959
  • November: 3528
  • December: 3112
  • January: 4591
  • February: 6545
  • March: 15,033
  • April: 13,957

SiteMeter
April Visitors: 9,527
April Page Views: 13,948

Monthly Traffic Whoring Charts

Daily Traffic Whore Charts

Technorati (As of April 30, 2008)
Whoring Rank: (131, 962) (down from 129,395)*
Whoring Authority: 69 (up from 58)

*Technorati obviously recalibrated in the middle of the month — thank you very little! — so we’ve been forced to claw our way back up again.

III. Feed Stats
Feedburner
59 subscribers (up from 50)

Bloglines
10 subscribers (down from 11) sigh

IV. Major Links

V. Forecast

April was a strong, if not record-breaking month, in traffic whoring. We don’t expect much from May, given that we have international travel plans and work obligations, but we will continue to add new features to expand the breadth of whoring coverage. We continue to maintain an impressionistic version of The Gay Recluse at Tumblr — i.e., just photos — mostly because it’s refreshingly easy to use (and look at).


In which The Gay Recluse scores selected opinions in The Times.

Thomas Friedman/Dumb as We Wanna Be

The Short Version: We need higher gas taxes and more $$$$ devoted to clean-energy R&D!

In his words: “At a time when we should be throwing everything into clean power innovation, we are squabbling over pennies.”

Score: A (Applause)
We completely agree with this column.  Hillary Clinton should be embarrassed for pledging to cut gas taxes.  (Which is not to say we hate her or anything!) We support gas credits/relief for the working poor, but the average American should be paying a lot more for gas (and big cars!).

Maureen Dowd/Praying and Preying 

The Short Version: Reverend Wright is a big test for Obama.

In her words: “Obama’s anger, an unused muscle, had to be stoked by his advisers, who pressed him with drooping poll numbers and the video of Wright at the National Press Club. ”

The Score: B- (Babble)
We understand that Dowd likes Obama — hey! we like him too — but we’re not sure she’s adding much with her mytho/psychoanalysis of Obama versus Reverend Wright. Is it us, or does this story seems to be getting kind of old, anyway?


In which The Gay Recluse sees you on the dark side of the moon.

We’d like to put forth the case that the most random graffiti can be found uptown.

Exhibit A: Spotted on the southbound platform of the 163rd Street subway station:

The cock is stupid, but we have to admit that the Roger Waters part made us laugh.


In which The Gay Recluse lives in an alternate reality.

For a long time we’ve kept an eye on the triple vacant lot at 573-577 West 161st Street, which we walk by  every day on our way to the 163rd Street subway station. In January, we were pleasantly surprised to see two of the three lots fenced off, leaving only 577 as an (illegal) parking lot.

Hi there, 573-577 West 161st Street!

Although five years ago (literally) we heard rumors about a church wanting to build, we didn’t expect much to happen, given that 1) we’ve never seen a construction project actually realized in this part of Washington Heights, and 2) the recession deterrent, which obviously looms large these days.

But! This morning our mind was blown to see a bulldozer rampaging through 573-575.

Woah! That’s a big piece of equipment!

And then! A quick jaunt to the Department of Buildings revealed that a permit has been issued for the construction of a brand-spanking new 17,000 square-foot/18-unit apartment building. Which seemed to prove that we weren’t in fact hallucinating! Plus the bulldozer was still there this afternoon on our way home from work.

Hey! Nice pile of dirt! Let’s hope the apartment building looks as good as the bulldozer.

All of this just seems to prove what we’ve long suspected: the real-estate market in this part of Washington Heights exists in a strange bubble that has nothing to do with the rest of the world. (Investors take note!) We’ll keep you posted on this alternate reality as it evolves.


In which The Gay Recluse scores selected opinions in The Times.

Bob Herbert/The Pastor Casts a Shadow

The Short Version: Oh nos! The Reverend is going to wreck everything!

In his words: “Faster than anyone could have imagined, the young Mr. Obama became Senator Obama and then the leading candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination.”

Score: B- (Bit much)
This column unfortunately gets bogged down by sentences such as the above, and although we understand Herbert’s concern, we think he’s taking the Reverend a bit too seriously. If anything, we think this will help Obama, because he now gets to put the smackdown on a self-inflated loser, which everyone loves to see.

David Brooks/Demography is King 

The Short Version: News flash! The Democratic party is divided between elite liberals and working-class stiffs.

In his words: “The upscale liberals who revere Obama have spent their lives championing equality and opposing privilege. ”

The Score: C- (Conceited)
Brooks takes a very basic idea that should be obvious to anyone who has spent more than five seconds following the campaign. The idea is this: city Democrats tend to like Obama and rural Democrats tend to like Clinton. There you have it in 13 words! He goes no further in his analysis, but  spends an entire column trying to make it sound complicated and revelatory. Even more ridiculously, he doesn’t once mention racism as a factor in this equation.


In which The Gay Recluse retires to our garden in Washington Heights.

Date of photograph: April 28, 2008, around 6:30pm

It’s hardly a secret that sometimes the spring garden looks better in the rain.

Today was one of those days…

One of our favorite plants is the creeping yellow groundcover, which we bought a few years ago at the Union Square green market.

They had a green market near us in Washington Heights one summer, but not enough people went so it never came back.

It’s probably not too smart to ever get your hopes up very high here.

Things change very slowly.

Which is why we always tell people who are considering the idea to move to Washington Heights.

It can teach you a lot about life gardening.

We’re pretty sure our groundcover is a golden creeping Jenny — Lysimachia nummularia — but we’re always open to corrections!

This reminds us of our old friend and bandmate Jennifer, who used to wonder why there were so many dumb bands/movies/books that used this formula (the present participle + girl’s name). Chasing Amy — as in “let’s convert the lesbians!” — is just one obvious example.

Whenever we pulled up to a club and saw one of these bands on the bill, we always had a sinking feeling that they were going to be horrible.

We were never wrong, either!

Not that we were so great, either, of course.

At one point we almost managed to kill the creeping jenny, and literally had only two or three tiny leaves left.

Then we put it the rocks, and like us, it’s a bit more settled now.

We think about all the people we hate, and all the people who hate us, and for a moment they all seem very far away.

Is it any wonder we always leave the garden with a heavy sigh?


In which The Gay Recluse invites readers to get drunk enjoy art in person.

Reader John Anthony Frederick sent us the following flier today for his photo exhibition in Albany:

To all of our readers in Albany: Hey, we think you should go! The tree photos look extremely cool: distant, distorted and contemplative. (Why not buy one!) And if it’s like art openings in “the city,” there will definitely be wine and hors d’oeuvres and — maybe? — hot singles. (Sadly, John informs us that there are no hot gay statues in Albany: wtf?) But maybe our hero David Paterson will be there! This reminds us of how we used to lie and tell people we met Stephen at an art opening, and how we told the lie so much that after few years, we actually started to believe it! But then we admitted the truth and felt better. But art openings still seem like a good place to meet someone, even in theory. Has anyone actually met a significant other at an art opening? (And did you take home any of the art?)


In which The Gay Recluse scores selected opinions in The Times.

Paul Krugman/Bush Made Permanent

The Short Version: The Maverick is a Loser!

In his words: “Mr. McCain proposes making almost all of the Bush tax cuts, which are currently scheduled to expire at the end of 2010, permanent.”

Score: B- (Basic)
We already know that the Maverick is not exactly the straight talker he purports to be, so this column is hardly a revelation.

William Kristol/Hillary Gets No Respect 

The Short Version: Hillary’s one tough cookie!

In his words: “Over to you, anguished liberals. ”

The Score: F (Funny)
Kristol is trying to deflect attention away from the fact that McCain is the sorriest candidate ever by focusing on the Obama/Clinton dust storm, as if that makes McCain any less sorry. Because Obama makes McCain look even sorrier than Clinton does, Kristol pretends to admire Clinton, which of course is quite funny! “But Hillary may well be the better candidate.” (You can practically hear the knives being sharpened in the background.)


In which The Gay Recluse scores selected opinion pieces in The Times.

Frank Rich/How McCain Lost in Pennsylvania

The Short Version: We’ll see who’s laughing in November!

In his words: “On the way to the finish line, the prolonged primary race, far from destroying the Democratic candidates, may do more insidious damage to the Republican nominee, lulling his campaign into an unjustified complacency.”

Score: B (Basic)
The column isn’t one to send to your friends, but it does represent a welcome return to logic for Frank Rich, who just last week (or was it two?) was ranting about the Democrats ruining their chances by not playing nice. If only Rich had been following The Gay Recluse, he could have written this column six or eight weeks ago and spared us a lot of drama and grief!

Nicholas Kristof/Odd Couple of the Jungle

The Short Version: The rain forest may be disappearing, but this eco-lodge in Eduador will cheer you up!

In his words: “So he invited the boy to move to the lodge and work and study.”

The Score: D (Dopey)
The Times, which we hear is about to impose some pretty severe layoffs in the beloved City Section, could save some $$$$ if it didn’t pay Nicholas Kristof to travel around the world bringing us his saccharine “up-close-and-personal” columns. This is nothing against the people he writes about of course — much less the larger issues of deforestation and global warming — but we don’t need these idiotic and stereotypical fluff pieces to understand why U.S. policy needs to change. Oh and we’re so impressed that Kristof “traveled through the jungle for nearly three hours to Yachana”! That’s like the daily subway commute for most New Yorkers, not that Kristof would know much about that! (One last thing: did anyone else think these guys might be gay? Now that would be an interesting story.)

Maureen Dowd/Desperately Seeking Street Cred

The Short Version: Why can’t Barack be a Man?

In her words: “The Nixonian Hillary has a ravenous hunger that Obama lacks.”

The Score: D (Done)
Dowd has already written this column fifty times, so we weren’t exactly happy to see it again.