On the Opinion Page: May 2, 2008
In which The Gay Recluse scores selected opinions in The Times.
Paul Krugman/Party of Denial
The Short Version: I still love Hillary even if she supports that stupid gas-tax holiday.
In his words: “But if the Democrats really want to pin the denialist label on John McCain, health care is the place to focus.”
Score: D+ (Desultory)
Krugman delivers a very unfocused column here, beginning with some whining about what Obama could have said better on his Fox News interview and then moving into some obvious points about how the Republicans are vulnerable on just about everything before finishing with an admission that Clinton’s gas-tax holiday proposal was a disappointment but that she’s still better than Obama, just because Krugman says so.
David Brooks/The Cognitive Age
The Short Version: Technology, not globalization, is what’s driving economic change in the world today.
In his words: “If you understand that you are living at the beginning of a cognitive age, you’re focusing on the real source of prosperity and understand that your anxiety is not being caused by a foreigner. ”
The Score: C- (Corporate)
What we like about this column is that Brooks conveys the reality that the world these days is ruled by corporations, and not countries. But unlike Brooks (and most of his Republican brethren), we’re not big believers in corporations (which is not to say we’re fans of nationalism, either) who are obviously the driving force behind the technological revolution Brooks describes. Like Brooks we tend to laugh at Democratic politicians who like to rally the troops with cheap talk of roping in globalization, but unlike Brooks, we also laugh at the Republicans who like to pretend that corporations are the answer to everything. The other thing we didn’t like about this column is Brooks’ needless reliance on academic jargon: if words like “cognitive” and “narrative” (in a political context) aren’t bad enough, does he really need to use “paradigm” NINE TIMES in a single column?
Filed under: Drivel, Government, Politicians, The Gay Recluse, The Times | 1 Comment
Tags: Barack Obama, David Brooks, Globalization, Hillary Clinton, Paradigms, Paul Krugman, Technology
A Note To Readers
Please note that The Gay Recluse has officially retired from blogging, but interested readers can now follow Matthew Gallaway on his blog here.Elsewhere for the Intrepid
Blogroll
- Acerbic Bubblegum
- Alex Ross
- Arch Noble
- Atherton Bartelby
- Bennett Madison
- Brendan Patrick Hughes
- Brett Berk
- Bright Year
- C-Monster
- Choire Sicha
- City Room
- Curbed
- Emily Magazine
- Ephemerist
- Fading Ad
- Fey Friends
- Francis Strand
- Gavin Plumley
- Gay Men’s Social Crisis
- GayAgenda
- Glennalicious
- Harlem Hybrid
- Hipster Runoff
- Inwood 10034
- James van Maanen
- Janeism
- Johnny I Hardly Knew You
- Manhattan Times
- Manhattan’s Peak
- MSnowe
- NYC The Blog
- One Monkey Show
- Out There
- Outside The Lines
- Queerty
- Rotten in Denmark
- Songs About Buildings and Food
- Sore Afraid
- Tangerines in a Red Net Bag
- The Main St. Diaries
- The Masterpiece Next Door
- The Streets Where We Live
- This Recording
- Tomorrow Museum
- Towleroad
- Trainstalking
- Trust Movies
- Write On My Man
- Zuzu Petals
The Popularity Contest
- On the George Washington Bridge Project: Death, Cruelty and Fiction
- On Hot Gay Statues: Met Hercules Extremely Smokin'
- On Hot Gay Statues: Vienna, Imperial Power, Will Crush Your Hot Gay Soul and Fill You with Hatred and Longing
- On the Search for The Gay Recluse: January 28, 2008
- On One Reason To Move To Washington Heights: The Smokin' Hot Statuary on Audubon Terrace
- On Hot Gay Statues: How Seriously Does the United States Lag in this Important Indicator of National Well-Being?
- On Hot Gay Statues: Madrid Shames the United States
- On Hot Gay Statues: Philadelphia Apparently Not Unfamiliar with the Concept
- On an Uncommissioned Masterpiece from the 163rd Street Subway Station
- On Hot Gay Statues: Two Davids Reveal Different Facets of Statuary Hotness
-
The Past
-
google verification
Ah yes, to quote some people much more clever than me (namely, the writers of “The Simpsons”): “Excuse me, but ‘proactive’ and ‘paradigm’? Aren’t those just buzzwords that dumb people use to sound important?”