In which The Gay Recluse makes a monthly report to the Board of Directors.
I. Summary
February was an outstanding month for The Gay Recluse. A combination of organic growth, continued linkage from Curbed and Queerty and several new links from Gawker all contributed to record numbers of visitors and page views.
II. Traffic Metrix
WordPress
Total Views February: 6545
Grand Total Number of Views: 19803
Monthly Breakdown
- September: 68
- October: 1959
- November: 3528
- December: 3112
- January: 4591
- February: 6545
SiteMeter
February Visitors: 4553
February Page Views: 7212
Monthly Traffic Charts

Daily Traffic Charts
Technorati (As of February 29, 2008)
Rank: 231,062 (up from 263,682)
Authority: 35 (up from 31)
Comments: For whatever reason, our links from “Top 100” blog Gawker (Authority=7,982) were not counted as official “reactions.” (This made us hate Technorati.)
III. Feed Stats
Feedburner
February 29: 37 subscribers (from 33 on January 31)
Bloglines
February 29: 9 subscribers (from 5 on January 31)
IV. Major Links
- Friday PM Linkage (Curbed)
- Thursday PM Linkage (Curbed)
- Whatever Homo Tendencies I Have Are Basically a Minor Health Problem (Gawker)
- Diluting the Homophobosphere (Gawker)
- Chris Crocker Mad at Homophobes, Media, Lady-Like Language (Queerty)
- Modern Love: Not Gay Enough [The Gays] (Gawker)
V. Forecast
February was marked by a (relatively) stunning increase in traffic, primarily thanks to Gawker and Curbed. While this kind of “linkage growth” is likely to prove unsustainable in the short term, we will continue to focus on organic growth with the continuation of several new “features” and dispatches from “correspondents,” including The London Eye. We have also launched an impressionistic version of The Gay Recluse at Tumblr, mostly because it’s refreshingly easy to use (and look at).
Filed under: Architecture, Capitalism, Infrastructure, Technology, The Gay Recluse, Traffic | Leave a Comment
Tags: Business Revenue, Curbed, Feedburner, Feeds, Gawker, Internet Traffic, Linkage, Metrix, Monthly Report, Queerty, RSS, SiteMeter, Technorati, Traffic Whoring, WordPress
In which The Gay Recluse updates his informal but rather telling quantitative analysis of Modern Love, the weekly Style Section (of The Times) column in which openly gay writers almost never appear, and even less frequently describe a romantic relationship. This week’s piece: Me, My Daughter and Them
Subject: A lawyer who sounds seriously bitchy (and not in a good way) miraculously has a parade of suitors over the years; because she wants to spend all of her non-lawyering time with her daughter, she sends them all packing; finally, a complete masochist wears her down. For our suggested alternative, click here.
Filed under: Straight Woman on Relationships
The updated tally (or why we feel like animals in the zoo): 6 out of 168 columns by openly gay writers; 1 out of 168 on female gay relationships; 0 out of 168 on male gay relationships. In what is arguably the “gayest” section of The Times, more women have written about gay men than gay men have.
Outstanding question to Daniel Jones, editor of Modern Love: wtf?
Straight Woman on Relationships iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiii (39)
Straight Woman on Family iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii (35)
Straight Woman on “Looking for Love” iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii ii (32)
Straight Woman on Breaking Up iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iii (23)
Straight Man on Relationships iiiii iiiii i (11)
Straight Man on Breakup iiiiii (6)
Straight Woman on Gay Men iiiii i (6)
Straight Man on Family iiiii (5)
Straight Man on “Looking for Love” iiii (4)
Gay Man on Family ii (2)
Gay Woman on Relationship i (1)
Gay Woman on Family i (1)
Gay Man on Self-Hatred i (1)
Gay Man on Prom Date i (1)
Ambiguous/Nurse on Drugs i (1)

Filed under: Conspiracy, Drag Queens, Search, Sickness, Stereotypes, Technology, The Gay Recluse, The Times | Leave a Comment
Tags: Daniel Jones, Fashion & Style, Gay Modern Love, Gay Stereotypes, Gay Voice, Gay Writers, Heidi Wendel, Homophobia, Lesbian, Modern Love, Republican, The New York Times
In which The Gay Recluse provides an alternative to this week’s more tedious and stereotypical Modern Love offering in The Times.
“Me, My Daughter and Them”
By Heidi Wendel and The Gay Recluse
MY newest girlfriend, vintage four weeks, was spending her first overnight at our Upper West Side apartment en famille and didn’t know the drill.
“I think I’ll watch a movie in the bedroom,” she said innocently, browsing through our movie collection like a tourist.
“But we’re reading out here,” I said, not caring that it sounded kinda bitchy. “Sophie’s doing homework.”
Sophie and I sat in our respective comfy chairs in the living room, feet up on the same ottoman. She was highlighting passages from her ninth-grade history text about the fight for women’s suffrage, while I kept her company, mulling the complications of a fraud case I was preparing for trial. A cozy frigid silence filled the room.
“I know,” my girlfriend said dismally. “You’ll have to turn the pages quietly or you might disturb me.”
She went out to the movies and we didn’t expect her back, at least not for the long term. But she stuck around for another six months before leaving for good. We were in love — or at least she was, ha ha — and it took a while for her to grow disenchanted with a situation in which she would always be secondary to my daughter’s priorities, her well being and her education.
It was more or less the same with the other girls who came and went over the years.
The first one, after Sophie and I struck out on our own 12 years ago, when she was starting kindergarten, was a perfect fit. She was a rock musician who often stayed up all night composing, and barely noticed that Sophie still slept with me. We never had sex anyway. Far from complaining that we never went out alone together, she considered himself lucky I didn’t give her grief for spending so many nights out playing bars and clubs. On weekends she was too tied up with rehearsals to notice our plans never included her.
But one night around 18 months after we met, under the romantic influence of a song she was writing about me and her and sometimes Sophie, it occurred to her that something was missing.
She crawled into bed humming a line from the song: “Not just now but forever, we’ll share a home together, baby.” It was only a half rhyme.
Swimming up from the sleepy underworld and sensing her next to me, I whispered: “Where are your pajamas? You feel like an animal.” I knew this sounded pretty bitchy, but I didn’t care.
“Oh, right, I forgot. But Sophie’s out cold over there anyway. And even with my shorts on I’d be naked for what I have to say, which is, how about I move in here and we get married next year in Massachusetts?”
I woke up fast then, as though fire trucks had shot down Broadway with their sirens blaring.
“Sure, let’s get married in Massachusetts next year,” I said slowly, playing along for the moment.
She broke into a verbal instrumental with percussive kisses, then cut it off as if she had been unplugged. “And we would obviously live together,” she said. “Right?”
Looking at Sophie, and thinking of our perfect life together, I couldn’t do it, not even for a great girl like her, a girl I sort of liked, a rock star. The next day she took her boxers out of the bottom drawer of the bureau and moved on.
The next girl caught on faster. At first she threw herself into us, introducing us to her parents and siblings, buying presents for our apartment, teaching Sophie chess. She stored her custom-made shirts in the closet and kept her single malts in the liquor cabinet. Of course I was a huge bitch, but it didn’t seem to bother her!
Sophie was the half-a-child she had always wanted. Without having to raise her, she had the benefit of her pleasant company over sushi and tapas. She never complained that my life didn’t revolve around her. She appreciated having a relationship that didn’t require her to reduce her billable hours. She liked being ordered around outside of the office.
The tide turned a few months later when we went on vacation without her. This trip was to be for Sophie and me only, and to avoid feeling pressured about it — and huge bitch that I am — I purposely didn’t tell her of our plans until about a week before our departure, at which point she seemed most offended that she hadn’t been consulted about where we would go and what we would see.
As a partner at a prominent law firm, she was used to being consulted about major decisions by everyone she knew. Had she known we were planning a trip to Tuscany, she — only slightly less of a bitch than me — would have advised us to stay in Lucca, which is less crowded and has better food than Siena. She would have warned us to make reservations to see the David and the Uffizi Gallery so we wouldn’t have had to wait in long lines. What a bitch! I kind of admired her.
On top of that, she was hurt that I hadn’t wanted her to go with us. Stupid bitch. Granted, she probably wouldn’t have been able to, because of her work schedule. But never before had she been excluded from a vacation by someone she loved and who had pretended to love her back.
When we called her from Pisa on the last day, she cross-examined me about my plans for our future and found my answers nonresponsive. I talked around the issues, trying to avoid admitting anything directly on point. Finally, though, she managed to pin me down.
“Look, isn’t it true you have no intention of moving in with me in the foreseeable future?” she asked. “Just answer the question.”
She had me cold. At her request, I put Sophie on the phone so she could say goodbye to her, too.
Following in her mother’s footsteps, Sophie tried to change the conversation. “This Duomo in Pisa is the most beautiful anywhere,” she said. “You really should see it some time.”
“Better than the ones in Florence and Siena?” she asked.
“I don’t know,” she said, “To be honest, I don’t remember those anymore.”
“Sure, because that’s how it is with you girls,” she said. “Here today, gone tomorrow.”
The years rolled by in the same vein until Sophie was in high school and I began to confront the fact that our long sleepover party would soon end. I knew the transition to an empty nest might be less painful if there were someone else around the house, but it was hard to imagine making that a reality when Sophie’s and my life together had grown even less conducive to sharing with a woman.
Who would be willing to put up with our monklike silence on nights and weekends while Sophie did homework? Who would tolerate my need to drop plans on a moment’s notice to spend whatever free time I could with her during the few years I had left?
But as her junior year was ending, a candidate presented herself.
She was a partner in a public relations firm who conveniently lived five hours away in Washington. Every other week or so she came up on business, hung out for a few days with interruptions to attend meetings and dinners, and then headed back. For months we were perfectly happy.
Like many of my romances, though, it seemed its very success would be its undoing. She was so happy, she wanted more. Soon she was researching public relations firms in New York and asking what a two-bedroom apartment cost in our neighborhood. For my part, I started researching reasons why the relationship should quickly end.
I thought I had my answer when she announced she was going on her annual weeklong hunting trip in West Virginia. Maybe she seemed like a good, kind woman, I thought, the type any woman would want to hang on to. But in fact she was the sort who killed animals for fun. While she blithely related her excitement at seeing her hometown and her brothers and cousins, I plotted my exit.
On our last evening together, before she was to set off in camouflage with her guns, she said happily, “I’ll bring you back a nice chunk of venison and a six pack of my hometown brew and mix you and Sophie up a venison stew like you never ate.”
“We don’t eat venison. We couldn’t eat a murdered deer.”
I hoped she would become angry, go off on her trip in a huff, complain about me to her brothers, and get some advice to get rid of me fast.
Instead, ever the P.R. woman, she changed her pitch to suit the client. “What makes you think I’ll shoot a deer?”
“You’re going to deer-hunting camp. You’re going to shoot a deer.”
“I may shoot a deer,” she said, smiling, “if one breaks into the camp and pulls a knife on me.”
“I’m serious,” I said.
“I am, too. If I shoot a deer, she’ll have left a suicide note. I only go there to hang out and shoot beer cans.”
Two months later she was still around and had started reading the real estate ads to me.
“Look at this nice two-bedroom with a balcony on Riverside Drive,” she said one Sunday while we sat entwined on the couch. “Why don’t we take a look at it with Sophie?”
I sat up. “Sophie couldn’t move now while she’s so busy with school and applying for college.” I tried to sound as bitchy as I could.
Undefeated, she looked around the apartment.
“Then maybe we could talk to an architect about making some modifications to this place to add a room.”
“I don’t think we could deal with having architects and designers in here doing renovations,” I said.
“But you subscribe to Architectural Digest,” she pointed out reasonably. “You’ve got three years of back issues on the bookshelf.”
“Not because we ever planned to renovate,” I said. “That stuff’s just porn for New York City apartment dwellers.”
I ASSUMED that would end it, but when she saw she wasn’t getting any traction, she reconcepted. The next time she was in town, she told me she was pitching some new clients in New York and it was important for her to have a New York address so the clients would feel more at home with her. How would I feel about sharing a mailbox with her? Just a mailbox, a 3-by-8-inch box. All I had to do was put a piece of tape with her name on it alongside my name and Sophie’s on the inside edge of the box where the mail carrier could see it.
That didn’t seem like much to ask. I added her name to the inside of the box and gave her a key.
It wasn’t until years later, when she and I were living together in a two-bedroom apartment with a balcony on Riverside Drive, that I found out she hadn’t been pitching any new clients in New York at all — none, that is, except for a certain stubborn one who lived with her daughter in an apartment on the Upper West Side.
In case it wasn’t obvious, Heidi Wendel is a lawyer.
Filed under: Conspiracy, Drivel, Gay, The Gay Recluse, The Times | 2 Comments
Tags: Daniel Jones, Fashion & Style, Frat Boys, Gay Modern Love, Heidi Wendel, Stereotypes, The New York Times
In which The Gay Recluse ponders a sampling of recent search terms used to find the very pages you are now reading. Note: All search terms listed are in the exact form provided by WordPress.com, which is the host (at least for a while) of this blog. Hyperlinks to relevant posts included.
Search: students ‘shallow and narrow-minded’
Comment: Daniel Jones asks for modern love stories from students: let’s hope he prints some gay ones. (His regular column doesn’t give us much hope.)
Search: westside piers gay
Comment: The sex may have been exciting, the documentary not so much.
Search: gay sex shit sandwich
Comment: What Roger Cohen typically tries to feed us on the opinion page of The Times (except for the gay-sex part).
Search: russian blue photography
Comment: We like to think we have some experience in this.
Search: the rainmaker with burt lancaster
Comment: They don’t make ’em like that anymore.
Search: gay daddy bears
Comment: Henry James, anyone?
Search: gay mans opion on big boobs
Comment: Someone once threatened to rub her big boobs all over us, but in a friendly way.
Search: i’m in the mood for love superbowl
Comment: In some ways, the best Super Bowl ever.
Search: gay buildings in washington heights
Comment: We wish there was more here in the way of luxury condominiums.
Search: gay modelling agency
Comment: Do you really think the world wouldn’t be a better place with Janice Dickinson as president of the United States?
Search: ferraro endorsement clinton
Comment: We endorsed Geraldine first and then Barack.
Search: bob mould vs grant hart
Comment: Can anyone be said to have won?
Search: poverty gay outcast
Comment: We scratch out an existence on the high cliffs of Washington Heights.

Filed under: Architecture, Gay, Infrastructure, Language, Search, The Gay Recluse, The Russian Blue, The Times, Washington Heights | Leave a Comment
Tags: Big Boobs, Bob Mould, Burt Lancaster, Daddy Bears, Daniel Jones, Gay Sex in the Seventies, Geraldine Ferraro, Grant Hart, Hüsker Dü, Henry James, Hot Bears, In the Mood for Love, Janice Dickinson, Outcast, Povery, Shit Sandwich, Super Bowl, The Rainmaker, West Side Piers
In which The Gay Recluse takes a field trip to Harlem and makes the case that the city should rezone the shit out of 125th Street.
Lately there has been a lot of press — from Curbed, The Times and others — about the city’s proposal to rezone 125th Street in Harlem. Much of this unfortunately buys into the stereotypical view that Harlem is filled with nothing but poor black folks on the verge of being thrown off a cliff by a small cabal of evil (white) businessmen in league with the mayor. Of all the articles we have read, only one — in the City Section of The Times a few weeks ago — describes anything close to the truth of the situation, which is that the battle being waged there (as everywhere else in the city world) has a lot less to do with race than class (i.e., money). In fact, it comes as news to many that much of the “evil” gentrification is coming at the hands of middle and upper-class African-Americans with as much right to make claims to the cultural heritage of Harlem as anyone else.
Particularly problematic are the uncritical posts we’ve been seeing from writers in the local “blogosphere” who now seek to rush in to defend Harlem from the city’s plans. Having apparently never visited the neighborhood themselves (or looked at the plan in any detail), they feel quite comfortable holding forth on the dangers of gentrification for the Harlem “community.” A good example of this comes today from Lost City (based in Cobble Hill, New Jersey Brooklyn) who tells us that “[t]he plan is stultifyingly stupid and misguided…I am surprised that somebody, anybody could think this was a good idea. The African-American community of Harlem sticks it out through thick and (mostly) thin, remaining in place so as to hold on to its history and heritage in the once-glorious, but long-blighted neighborhood, and how does the City repay them? By opening the gate to blue-chip development.”
Ok, so we live in Washington Heights, which is not exactly the same as Harlem, but is close and “uptowny” enough that we would like to surprise Lost City (and others like him) by saying that we not only think the City’s plan is a good idea, but we crave blue-chip development. Blue-chip development? Uptown? You’re saying there’s too much of it? The fact is, we don’t even know what it is. (We feel like a native who has just been told by an American that we shouldn’t want television or any other modern convenience because it’s really “bad” for us.)
Let’s pause for a moment and take a closer look at the City plan, which can be found in full here. The “Main Goals” include:
1) The zoning proposal seeks to sustain and enhance the revitalization of 125th Street as a unique Manhattan Main Street. Key to the zoning proposal is establishing a new special purpose district for the 125th Street corridor. The special purpose district allows the proposed zoning regulations to respond to specific conditions with customized density, building form controls and use regulations. The proposal incorporates a balanced rezoning approach that creates incentives for new mixed-use development where appropriate and that protects the corridor’s existing scale and character, particularly along those portions of the corridor where there is occupied housing. The zoning proposal seeks also to expand opportunities for the creation of housing, including affordable housing, by increasing the density allowed for residential development in certain areas and by offering an inclusionary housing bonus in the areas where increases in residential density are proposed.
2) The zoning proposal seeks to support the growth of 125th Street as a premier arts, culture and entertainment destination. A mechanism is included to support the creation of uses that would complement existing and future arts and cultural venues and expand the range of activities along the corridor. The proposal also includes regulations to promote distinctive signage that would reinforce the street’s arts, culture and entertainment character.
3) In keeping with 125th Street’s pedestrian vibrancy, the zoning proposal seeks to improve the pedestrian experience by ensuring that active uses occupy the ground floor of new developments and that their street frontage includes some degree of transparency. In connection with these requirements, the proposal would also limit the ground floor frontage of banks and similar ‘non-active’ uses.
Does this seem “stultifyingly stupid” to you? Does it not take steps to provide affordable housing and to enhance the urban quality of the street while maintaining its historic character? If anything, it seems eminently reasonable to us, given that 125th Street is currently marked by 1) shitty — no, the shittiest possible — retail stores and fast-food restaurants, 2) abandoned property and storefronts, and 3) great swaths of post-war architecture with about as much interest as a New Jersey strip mall. (See pix below.) We would also like to note that the City has no plans to alter the few grand dames of 125th Street, namely “historic buildings such as the Apollo Theater, Theresa Towers and the Corn Exchange which are registered New York City Landmarks.” (More pix below.)
Much has also been made of Planning Commissioner Amanda Burden’s statement in The Times to the effect that she went to a Roberta Flack concert at the Apollo some time ago and was told by a friend afterward that they should go downtown to eat because there was nothing in the vicinity. “There should be a million different eateries around there, and this is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to frame and control growth on 125th Street,” Ms. Burden said, according to The Times.
Lost City’s response to this is typical in both tone and substance: “If I had gone to that Roberta Flack concert and was hungry afterwards, I would have known where to eat. I would have known where to go. Anyone who knew the first thing about Harlem would have. The place may not have had white tablecloths or a snooty hostess or careful lighting, but it would have had good food, some of it of a kind you can’t find the better of anywhere in the City. Sylvia’s, Amy Ruth’s, Rao’s and Patsy’s, just to begin with the legendary places. There is wonderful Senegalese food to be found. A Zagat’s will tell you about plenty more.”
Umm, somehow we don’t get the sense that Lost City has spent a lot of any time on 125th Street, particularly at or around midnight, when we can assume the concert ended. Sylvia’s — which is two very long (and at midnight, desolate) blocks away — closes at 10:30pm (even if we did want to eat at a place known for attracting the tour buses); Amy Ruth’s is on 116th and Lennox (even further away); and meanwhile, Rao’s and Patsy’s are in East Harlem, not even walkable from the Apollo. As for Zagat, we invite you to crunch the numbers: when you compare the number of Zagat-rated restaurants to the geographical size of Harlem, you find that it has 99 percent fewer entries per square mile than any neighborhood south of 110th Street. What does this mean in practical terms? Ask anyone who lives uptown what they think of local restaurants and shopping and we guarantee in response a facial expression that can only be described as haunted. The last thing we need is “help” from those who want to protect us from getting the same kind of urban services they inevitably take for granted.

“Save the beauty supply and 99 cent stores!”

“Unmatched architectural grandeur and significance!”

“Save the shells!”

“Save these shells, too!”

“Evil gentrifiers offer Harlem fresh bread and coffee!”
![]()

“Look what Settepani did to the block!!!! (Only six more shells!) (Note the evil gentrifier/fag with baby carriage!!!)”
![]()

“Evil gentrifier pushes out empty storefront (only 6,453 remaining)!”

Hotel Theresa (surrounded by crap.)

The Koch Building (Note the excellent restaurant cool store vacant storefront in the middle.)

The Apollo (Note all of the great restaurants within walking distance.)
Filed under: Architecture, Brooklyn, Decay, Disaster Footage, Drivel, Gentrification, Government, Knockbusters, New York City, Photography, Politicians, Retail, Ruins, Stereotypes, The Gay Recluse | Leave a Comment
Tags: 125th Street, City Plan, City Planning, Class, Gentrification, Harlem, Race, Stereotypes, The Times, Theresa
In which The Gay Recluse scores selected opinion pieces in The Times.
David Brooks/Remembering the Mentor
The Short Version: Even though he was a Nazi, I loved William F. Buckley.
In her words: “Buckley was not only a giant celebrity, he lived in a manner of the haut monde.”
Score: F (Foolish)
In this column we have Brooks longing for the conservative, aristocratic society epitomized by Buckley and his narrow-minded (bigoted) colleagues and admirers. What’s most incredible about this society is how obsessively “gay” it is in every respect of the word — high art, high design, highly decadent (and lots of gay sex, but only in dark closets and hallways) — while its members try to pass themselves off as patriotic, courageous and (above all, and most cynically) morally righteous. (Brooks, of course, is completely oblivious to this, which makes his column tragically naive.) The “best” example of this paradox at play can be found in the Nazi elite in pre-war Germany, a society in which we get the sense that Buckley would have felt very much at home (even as Brooks was hauled off to the camps). We think of Luchino Visconti’s beautiful, harrowing treatment of this same era and understand why he called his film The Damned.
Filed under: Capitalism, Dissonance, Drivel, Film, Gay, History, Obsession, The Gay Recluse, The Times | Leave a Comment
Tags: David Brooks, Luchino Visconti, Nazi Germany, The Damned, The New York Times, William F. Buckley
On Roses and Ruins
In which The Gay Recluse contemplates an uncommissioned masterpiece from the walls of an uptown subway station.
Filed under: Capitalism, Decay, Dissonance, Longing, New York City, Photography, Subway, The Gay Recluse, Washington Heights | Leave a Comment
Tags: 163rd Street, Masterpieces, Roses, Ruins, Subway, Washington Heights
In which The Gay Recluse becomes increasingly obsessed with The George Washington Bridge.
Time and Date of photograph: February 28, 2008, 7:56am.
Notes: The sky is starting to seem spring-like, but it was actually close to minus-fifty.

“It was to be encased in granite but because of the Depression was never done and the structure remained as it is.”
— James Renner, Washington Heights, Inwood and Marble Hill
Filed under: Capitalism, Dissonance, GWB Project, Photography, The Gay Recluse, Washington Heights, Weather | Leave a Comment
Tags: 1947, Blue, February, George Washington Bridge, James Renner, Minus-Fifty, Morning Light
In which The Gay Recluse contemplates an uncommissioned masterpiece from the walls of an uptown subway station.

Filed under: Conspiracy, Gay, Graffiti, Infrastructure, New York City, Subway, The Gay Recluse, Washington Heights | Leave a Comment
Tags: Advertising, Graffiti, MTA, Subway Art, Transit Check
On Washington Heights Monopoly: 577 West 161st Street (or How To Run an Illegal Parking Lot)
In which The Gay Recluse reports on real estate in Washington Heights.
A few weeks ago we reported on three vacant lots, two of which seem to be owned by a church and a third by a doctor’s office.

Today, in response to reader e-mails, we thought we’d update you on the latest, which is that the doctors — despite being denied a permit from the city — have continued to run the parking lot. (They are doctors, after all.) This has severely tested the patience of certain neighbors and street parkers; the neighbors apparently don’t like looking an at outdoor parking lot (and we don’t really blame them) and street parkers because parking is already tight on the street, which begs the question of why an illegal parking lot should be allocated curb space.
As a public service to our neighbors and street parkers, we would like to tell you that anybody should feel free to park in front of this “driveway” and be assured that the city will not tow or ticket you, because it is a legal parking spot! Do not be bullied by the idiotic pylons, which are nothing more than idiotic pylons! In short: Park and be free!
But lest we be accused of subjective journalism or maintaining an “agenda,” for those geniuses out there interested in running an illegal parking lot of your own, we now present a five-step pictogram with detailed instructions on how to do it.
Five Steps To an Illegal Parking Lot

Vacant lot not included.
Filed under: Architecture, Bad Rock, Gentrification, Government, Monopoly, The Gay Recluse, Washington Heights | Leave a Comment
Tags: 577 West 161st Street, Curb Cut Denial, Development, Doctors, Fences, Illegal Parking, Monopoly, Parking Lots, Pylons, Vacant Lots
In which The Gay Recluse wonders if Deborah Solomon thinks we’re impressed. (Because we’re not.)
Usually we skip Deborah Solomon’s weekly interview in the Sunday Magazine, in which the notoriously harsh and arrogant New York Times critic tersely interrogates a publicity hound hawking a useless book about the latest nonsense du jour. But this week we made an accidental exception; in the course of doing some research on our favorite subject (i.e., gay stereotyping at The Times), we stumbled across the following exchange from this past Sunday’s version. The interview is with Rick Perry, the governor of Texas who has made a reputation for being an even bigger asshole even more conservative than his predecessor, _____. Herewith we present some of the exchange:
Solomon: Let’s talk about your new book, “On My Honor,” which draws on your experience as an Eagle Scout and champions the values of the Boy Scouts of America, to whom you are donating your royalties. Perry: Yes, to their legal-defense fund.
Which has been fighting the A.C.L.U., to keep gays out of the scouts. Why do you see that as a worthy cause? I am pretty clear about this one. Scouting ought to be about building character, not about sex. Period. Precious few parents enroll their boys in the Scouts to get a crash course in sexual orientation.
Why do you think a homosexual would be more likely to bring the subject of sex into a conversation than a heterosexual? Well, the ban in scouting applies to scout leaders. When you have a clearly open homosexual scout leader, the scouts are going to talk about it. And they’re not there to learn about that. They’re there to learn about what it means to be loyal and trustworthy and thrifty.
But don’t you think that homosexuals might also be interested in being loyal and thrifty? The argument that gets made is that homosexuality is about sex. Do you agree?
No. Well, then why don’t they call it something else?
[End of excerpt. (Phew–that was rough!)]
Obviously, we aren’t going to waste our breath talking about why this Perry character is such a numskull, but we would like let Solomon know that 1) we really hate the way you refer to “homosexuals” and “heterosexuals” with such pseudo-scientific seriousness. If you have to talk about clumps of people — and we understand the need — it’s far better to use a Gawkeresque expression like “the gays” and “the straights,” which efficiently acknowledges both the utility and stupidity of such labels and the associated stereotypes and then lets you make your stupid point. Basically, if you’re still using “homosexual” in an unironic manner, you’re guaranteed to come off with about as much authority as a 1950s sex manual (but sadly, much less entertaining); 2) we don’t understand why, with all the great books blog posts being written, you (or more likely, your editors) had to pick an Official Asshole Republican to interview in The Times (wtf?). The problem with presenting this kind of exchange in such a restrained, diplomatic manner (even if you are a lil bitchy, whatev) is that it gives the impression that both opinions are equally reasonable, as if you both are discussing a choice between a cherry and apple pie. The only rational response to someone like Perry is, “Smell you later, you fascist, homophobic pig! Just because you might not like sucking cock, do you think that makes you better than everyone who does? WTF?” Seriously, if Perry were saying the same thing but in racial terms, do you think The Times would let him use their platform? We think not, and for good reason! and 3) although we don’t entirely doubt that your heart was in the right place, your attempt to defend “homosexuals” only made us feel like animals in the zoo (and that makes us sad.)

Filed under: Architecture, Conspiracy, Drivel, Sickness, Stereotypes, The Gay Recluse, The Times | Leave a Comment
Tags: Asshole Republicans, Deborah Solomon, Gawker, Homophobia, New Media, Old Media, Rick Perry, Stereotypes, Texas, The Gays, The New York Times, The Straights
In which The Gay Recluse becomes increasingly obsessed with The George Washington Bridge.
Time and Date of photograph: February 26, 2008, 7:56am.
Notes: The morning light — not unlike our mood — is not so much blue as tinged with blue.

“The George Washington Bridge over the Hudson is the most beautiful bridge in the world. Made of cables and steel beams, it gleams in the sky like a reversed arch. It is blessed. It is the only seat of grace in the disordered city. It is painted an aluminum color and, between water and sky, you see nothing but the bent cord supported by two steel towers. When your car moves up the ramp the two towers rise so high that it brings you happiness; their structure is so pure, so resolute, so regular that here, finally, steel architecture seems to laugh. The car reaches an unexpectedly wide apron; the second tower is very far away; innumerable vertical cables, gleaming against the sky, are suspended from the magisterial curve which swings down and then up. The rose-colored towers of New York appear, a vision whose harshness is mitigated by distance.”
— Le Corbusier, When the Cathedrals Were White, 1947.
Filed under: GWB Project, Photography, Ruins, Technology, The Gay Recluse | Leave a Comment
Tags: 1947, Blue, February, George Washington Bridge, Le Corbusier, Morning Light
In which The Gay Recluse would like to think “outside the box.”
Heating bills keep getting higher and higher, and despite global warming, there are days when it’s still very, very cold. Freezing air rushes through open windows, and we wonder: what can we possibly do about it? Any complex problem would seem to require an equally complex solution, and one that is beyond the ability of one person to solve. Perhaps, then, we should form a committee? Sigh. If only everything wasn’t so complicated.

Our apartment building on the coldest day of the year. We’re freezing and heating bills are high, yet what can we possibly do about it?
Filed under: Architecture, Infrastructure, New York City, The Gay Recluse, Washington Heights | Leave a Comment
Tags: Efficiency, February, Heating Bills, Idiocy, Iraq, Oil, Problem Solving, Washington Heights, Wind, Windows
In which The Gay Recluse ponders two photographs of an immense white brick wall and doesn’t regret taking drugs.
Photograph 1: Here we see one photograph of an immense white brick wall. Like 90 percent of the architecture in Washington Heights, it is thousands of years old and on the verge of collapse. Note how the streaks enhance the ruined quality of the structure. Count the bricks! We could happily stare at this for days.

Photograph 2: Here is a second photograph of the same wall; this one was taken with a flash, which led to the (annoying) trippy sun-spotted effect (which we have grown to hate). Although we don’t recommend taking drugs every day, we have always maintained that nobody should go through life without tripping their brains out at least once; otherwise, how will you ever lose yourself in the myriad patterns of the world, the very best of which arrive unadulterated to give us relief when we need it most?

Filed under: Architecture, Decay, Obsession, Photography, Ruins, The Gay Recluse | Leave a Comment
Tags: Bricks, Drugs, Hallucinogens, LSD, Magic Mushrooms, Patterns, Ruins, Tripping, Washington Heights, White Walls
In which The Gay Recluse ponders a photograph of the George Washington Bridge and provides an interesting (and possibly depressing) fact.
Date of photograph: February 24, 2008
Notes: We were rushing out to buy donuts and didn’t notice the reflection of the window to the right. (Oh well.)

Interesting (and Possibly Depressing) Fact: The George Washington Bridge opened in October, 1931, nine months ahead of schedule.
Source of I(aPD) Fact: James Renner, Washington Heights, Inwood and Marble Hill, (Arcadia Publishing, 2007), p.68.
Filed under: Government, GWB Project, Infrastructure, Landscape, New York City, Photography, The Gay Recluse, Washington Heights | Leave a Comment
Tags: Arcadia Publishing, Construction Schedules, Depressing Facts, Donuts, Images of America, Interesting Facts, The George Washington Bridge, Washington Heights
In which The Gay Recluse updates his informal but rather telling quantitative analysis of Modern Love, the weekly Style Section (of The Times) column in which openly gay writers almost never appear, and even less frequently describe a romantic relationship.
This week’s piece: An April Fools’ Joke I Played on Myself
Subject: A frat boy experiences a pang of loss when his brother (an even bigger frat boy) breaks up with his junior-high girlfriend after 15 years of dating. For our suggested alternative, click here.
Filed under: Straight Man on Relationships
The updated tally (or why we feel like animals in the zoo): 6 out of 167 columns by openly gay writers; 1 out of 167 on female gay relationships; 0 out of 167 on male gay relationships. In what is arguably the “gayest” section of The Times, more women have written about gay men than gay men have.
Outstanding question to Daniel Jones, editor of Modern Love: wtf?
Straight Woman on Relationships iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iii (38)
Straight Woman on Family iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii (35)
Straight Woman on “Looking for Love” iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii ii (32)
Straight Woman on Breaking Up iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iii (23)
Straight Man on Relationships iiiii iiiii i (11)
Straight Man on Breakup iiiiii (6)
Straight Woman on Gay Men iiiii i (6)
Straight Man on Family iiiii (5)
Straight Man on “Looking for Love” iiii (4)
Gay Man on Family ii (2)
Gay Woman on Relationship i (1)
Gay Woman on Family i (1)
Gay Man on Self-Hatred i (1)
Gay Man on Prom Date i (1)
Ambiguous/Nurse on Drugs i (1)

Filed under: Drivel, Language, Stereotypes, The Gay Recluse, The Times | Leave a Comment
Tags: Daniel Jones, Fashion & Style, Frat Boys, Homophobia, Jay Ruttenberg, Modern Love, Stereotypes, The New York Times













