In which The Gay Recluse is Manhattan Born.
Location: Edgecomb Avenue and we forget exactly.
When we first looked at this, we thought it said “Manhattan Born,” which we kind of prefer, even though we’re not exactly from here. Or are we, now that we’ve lived here almost ten years?
Whenever anyone asks me for something to put into a time capsule, I tell them not to bother. The manhole covers will last longer and look better than anything I could give them.
–Andy Warhol
Filed under: Architecture, City Pattern Project, Communism, Decay, Gay, The Gay Recluse | Leave a Comment
Tags: Manhattan, Manhole Covers, Sugar Hill
In which The Gay Recluse becomes increasingly obsessed with manhole covers.
Location: Edgecomb Avenue and 159th Street
Is this the best manhole cover ever? Perhaps it is. We could stare at this for a thousand years, on or off drugs.
Whenever anyone asks me for something to put into a time capsule, I tell them not to bother. The manhole covers will last longer and look better than anything I could give them.
–Andy Warhol
Filed under: Capitalism, City Pattern Project, Decay, Infrastructure, Landscape, Photography, The Gay Recluse, Washington Heights | 4 Comments
Tags: Andy Warhol, Drugs, Manhole Covers, Weiner Werkstatte
In which The Gay Recluse watches birds.
Tonight we saw one bird in the fading sun.
Which was one more than we usually see.
Which begs the question:
Are the birds not usually there?
Or are we just learning how to see?
Filed under: Animals, GWB Project, Landscape, Obsession, The Gay Recluse | Leave a Comment
Tags: Birds, Palisades, Sunsets
In which The Gay Recluse is rendered delirious by delays.
As we were waiting at the Pittsburgh airport, we were struck by the unexpected beauty of this stone riverbed.
And this one, too. It wasn’t too hard to imagine that we were out west somewhere.
But only if we didn’t let the scope of our vision get too wide!
This kind of looks like a jail.
Too close was also a mistake.
Filed under: Architecture, Capitalism, Dissonance, Infrastructure, Landscape, Photography, The Gay Recluse, Travel | 2 Comments
Tags: Airports, Cigarettes, Gum, Jails, Pittsburgh, Riverbeds
In which The Gay Recluse updates his informal but rather telling quantitative analysis of Modern Love, the weekly Style Section (of The Times) column in which openly gay writers almost never appear, and even less frequently describe a romantic relationship.
This week’s piece: How My Husband Won Back My Vote by Andrea Neighbours
Subject: A woman writes about how campaigning for her workaholic husband reinvigorated their marriage. Zzzzzz. For our equally boring version, click here.
Filed under: Straight Woman on “Family”
The updated tally (or why we feel like animals in the zoo): 7 out of 184 columns by openly gay writers; 2 out of 184 on female gay relationships; 0 out of 184 on male gay relationships. In what is arguably the “gayest” section of The Times, more women have written about gay men than gay men have.
Straight Woman on Relationships iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iii (43)
Straight Woman on Family iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii ii (37)
Straight Woman on “Looking for Love” iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii (35)
Straight Woman on Breaking Up iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iii (23)
Straight Man on Relationships iiiii iiiii ii (12)
Straight Man on Breakup iiiiii (6)
Straight Woman on Gay Men iiiii i (6)
Straight Man on Family iiiii ii (7)
Straight Man on “Looking for Love” iiiii ii (7)
Gay Man on Family ii (2)
Gay Woman on Relationship ii (2)
Gay Woman on Family i (1)
Gay Man on Self-Hatred i (1)
Gay Man on Prom Date i (1)
Ambiguous/Nurse on Drugs i (1)

Filed under: Conspiracy, Language, Search, Sickness, Stereotypes, The Gay Recluse, The Times | Leave a Comment
Tags: Andrea Neighbours, Daniel Jones, The New York Times, Workaholics
In which The Gay Recluse presents a gay alternative to this week’s Modern Love offering in The Times. Please note that The Gay Recluse is an evil traffic whore and the essay on which the below parody is based was “lifted from The Times without permission.” Those looking for our quantitative analysis should click here.
LAST year I boycotted our 18th wedding anniversary. My partner, Andrea (yes, that’s her name, too!) had gone out of town for our anniversary day but had left me a gift. I refused to open it. She called at least 10 times. I didn’t answer. And, for the first time, I didn’t give her an anniversary gift. I desperately wanted to make a statement, to shake us out of our ingrained and selfish habits.
Louisiana had suffered two devastating hurricanes in 2005, and Andrea happened to run the state’s recovery program. It was intense, stressful work, and my partner is as dedicated as they come. But two years in, something had to give, and I was afraid it was going to be us.
I was no stranger to Andrea’s all-consuming jobs, but now her work had begun to consume our family.
She would routinely enter the house at night with a finger to her lips so no one would greet her while she finished a work call. Most family dinners she spent pacing the back porch on her BlackBerry, solving another can’t-wait crisis.
Her work obsession was so notorious that our friends made sport of snapping pictures of her glued to her phone at the few nonwork events she attended, like the New Orleans Jazz Fest. Grouchy and neglected, I became the quintessential bitch, maligning her in advance of an anticipated slight.
Then came our Easter beach trip to Alabama. No sooner had we buckled our seat belts than Andrea announced she needed absolute silence for the first hour of our drive while she took a call from a Washington bigwig. We grumbled and pouted but restrained ourselves admirably.
Or so I thought. When my once relaxed and fun-loving partner got off the phone, she turned and chewed out our kids for laughing in the back seat. Laughing!
That’s right, I thought, nothing to laugh about here. We argued, and I proceeded to sulk through the weekend, freezing her out at every opportunity. On the sullen drive home, I schemed up my anniversary boycott for the following month.
Andrea’s anniversary present to me sat unopened on our kitchen counter for 79 days, from May to August, when I finally conceded that she could re-gift it for my birthday. But all summer it served as a daily reminder that we needed to treat each other better and make our marriage a priority again.
The way we had in the beginning, when, six days after our wedding, we left behind our gifts and friends to fly off for a three-month seat-of-the-pants European bicycle journey, and then to Tanzania, where Andrea had won a yearlong Rotary scholarship.
Ours was a marriage launched in adventure, risk and the unknown. We cared for each other through intestinal worms, malaria and schistosomiasis. Often isolated by language, race and culture, we discovered that being strangers together in a strange land built a special intimacy, respect and trust.
After we returned, Andrea pursued a career of high-profile political work, including stints as chief of staff for two Louisiana governors. Although raising two children, now 13 and 14, certainly could be considered another joint foray as strangers in a strange land, we often found that parenthood left us more alone than together on everything from discipline to car-pooling to weekends at the La Quinta Inn for an away swim meet.
Then we fell into the black hole of hurricane recovery.
After two decades together, our relationship was on the verge of becoming another storm casualty. My anniversary boycott succeeded in pulling us from the brink: we established rules about BlackBerry use, committed to official date nights, bit our tongues and tried to listen to each other more.
Months later, when the time came for Andrea to transition out of her job, she cut back her hours, allowing her more time for bike rides on the Mississippi River levee, children’s soccer games and movies. All of which helped, but we were still in the same basic situation, just better behaved. I feared our days of transformation were behind us.
Until, that is, our congressman quit midstream to become a lobbyist. The Louisiana governor called a special election to fill the job, and Andrea said she wanted to run.
At first I didn’t know what to think. I was intrigued but worried that the stress of a campaign would undo the stability we had recently achieved. Our son, recalling Andrea’s intention to spend more time with us, viewed it as a broken promise.
Only our daughter saw a potential upside, saying, “Do you know how popular I’ll be?”
But in chewing over the decision with Andrea, I began to feel something familiar stir in me. It was the same feeling of passion and teamwork from our early days, that adventurous time in our lives when we had more dreams than answers, when we realized that what remained in the bank, if all else failed, was each other.
For two weeks we wrestled with the question, weighing our financial concerns, the children’s after-school schedules and the two dream jobs she would turn down.
What if she lost? Then again, what if she won and had to commute between Baton Rouge and Washington every week?
Finally we decided to go for it. I forced a nervous smile as she launched her campaign with a speech she had practiced endlessly at our dining room table. As her tempo built, I stopped listening for “ums” and missteps and started nodding my own “amens.”
The lady knew what she was talking about. All those years of dedicated work had given her a wealth of insight and experience. Our leap off the cliff sprouted wings.
As the campaign began in earnest, I shoved aside my work and activities to serve the cause. The children’s social lives were also put on hold for a relentless series of events: meet and greets, fund-raisers, debates.
In Andrea ’s previous positions, I skipped many of the social events she was expected to attend, preferring to spend my time working alone. But in this mad dash of a campaign, I was fully on board.
Our daughter embraced it, too. She loved the media attention (especially being in a television commercial) and the crush of activity at our house: late-night strategy sessions and speech practice.
Our son felt abandoned for a while but then became swept up in the excitement as well, and soon he and his sister were distributing fliers, waving signs, entering names into databases, creating a Facebook page for publicity, even dressing our dog in a campaign T-shirt and parading around the farmers’ market.
I attended Andrea ’s first meet and greet as moral support, arriving late and frazzled, not intending to participate. I devoured three powdery lemon bars before sinking into the couch to listen to Andrea present her vision to the small crowd. Someone asked about health care, and Andrea talked about her plan for managing the skyrocketing costs. When I raised my hand, she looked at me in surprise.
Earlier in the day I had been at the state Office of Group Benefits looking into our own insurance needs, and I told the group about how I had commiserated with a woman there, talking up Andrea and her candidacy, and had left with the promise of a bunch of votes.
The living room crowd clapped wildly. Shyness be damned. For 36 days, multiple times each day, I found myself erupting with stories about the qualities I love most in my partner: her scrappy nature, her ability to get along with that person in the office no one else can tolerate, how we love to cook together, how we stay up too late talking and strategizing.
I bragged about her unusual accomplishments professionally — leaping the partisan divide to serve consecutively as chief of staff to a Republican, then Democratic governor. How she came home at night determined to create the most talented and racially diverse Louisiana state agency ever. Plus the gays!
At one event late in the campaign, a battle-hardened lobbyist asked me, “So what’s your take on this campaign?”
She was a political junkie seeking insider opinion. I gave it to her, though it wasn’t exactly what she was expecting: “I recommend a political campaign to anyone whose marriage needs work.”
When she looked at me funny, I said, “After two decades together, it was all too easy for me and Andrea to insult each other, despite how much we love each other.”
She nodded as if she had been there. And frankly, who hasn’t?
How often, I explained to the lobbyist, do you have the chance to stand up and broadcast everything beautiful and impressive about the person you love? And to do it over and over again?
Later that night she caught up with me and thanked me for what I had said.
AFTER 18 years, anyone’s marriage can fall into a rut. But campaigning for my partner made me fall in love with her all over again. This was never more true than on that unbearable Saturday night in March when I stood beside Andrea as she gripped the podium and faced the crowd of friends and supporters who had believed in her campaign as wholly as I had. The returns were in, and Andrea had lost.
Ever the optimist, Andrea used her concession speech to extol the virtues of our community, recalling the strength of people who had rebuilt after Katrina and Rita. She also sent a message of love and appreciation my way, thanking me for how I had pushed her to dream, to imagine better, to never settle for the status quo. She was talking about politics, but she might as well have been speaking about our marriage.
The next day, Andrea and I drove around Baton Rouge thanking her supporters and collecting yard signs. Plucking those signs from the earth felt as if we were yanking up flowers by the roots.
But I wore my silver necklace, the one I had ignored for 79 days, my anniversary-cum-birthday gift. With its hundreds of delicately crafted silver fingers, the necklace far outshined my khaki shorts and campaign T-shirt.
I wore it that day knowing I had earned it. We both had — giver and receiver. For taking a risk and venturing back into a strange land together. For needing each other again. The campaign took us to great heights and led to a bruising fall, yet it also gave us a cushion to ease our landing.
__________, a writer in Baton Rouge, La., recently completed her first novel.
Filed under: Drivel, Politicians, Stereotypes, The Gay Recluse, The Times | 2 Comments
Tags: Gay Modern Love, Parodies, Traffic Whores, Zzzzzzzz
On the Imminent Death of Flies
In which The Gay Recluse introduces the pitcher plants.
This is the first year for our new pitcher plants (Sarracenia).
Flies, we have one message for you: beware!
The pitcher plant will eat you for breakfast, lunch and dinner.
And dessert, too.
Filed under: Conspiracy, New York City, Pessimism, The Gay Recluse, The Spring Garden, Washington Heights | Leave a Comment
Tags: Flies, Meals, Pitcher plants, Sarracenia
In which The Gay Recluse becomes increasingly obsessed with The George Washington Bridge.
Today it’s off to Pittsburgh for the weekend.
Travel is so much fun these days!
But at least the sky is clear.
We’ll miss the bridge.
And Zephyr.
And Dante, who would like to remind everyone: not every cat is a lolcat!
I, too, have an obsession with the George Washington Bridge. However, mine involves a nagging compulsion to complete a football pass from the deck of the bridge to a buddy on the ground below.
Filed under: Animals, Architecture, GWB Project, Landscape, Longing, Nostalgia, Not Every Cat a Lolcat, The Gay Recluse, The Russian Blue, Travel | 1 Comment
Tags: Airports, Clear, Sky, The George Washington Bridge
In which The Gay Recluse rather quickly dies of lung cancer.
Chronic pollution is a lot like chronic pain.
You know it’s there but it’s hard to get rid of.
Particularly when everyone’s doing it!
Sometimes it blows right in the window.
And makes us wish we lived in Vermont.
The oily black smoke of 100-year-old boilers disperses daily across the rooftops in Washington Heights, heedless of those (including birds) who suffer from pneumonia, asthma and tuberculosis. Officials and politicians? Not even footnotes in this story, which is about the aggregation of capital and the relentless rise of the metropolis.
–The Gay Recluse, 9/29/07
Filed under: Capitalism, Government, GWB Project, Health, Landscape, Pessimism, Sickness, The Gay Recluse | Leave a Comment
Tags: Asthma, Dickens, Industrial Revolution, Landlords, Lung Cancer, Polluters, Slumlords, Views
In which The Gay Recluse becomes increasingly obsessed with The George Washington Bridge.
Today we were reading on Gawker about how to be a successful traffic whore blogger.
Number one was “listicles,” which we sometimes do. This is sort of a list, right?
Then “creating coherent characters.” We definitely could use some work in that department.
Next was to use Digg, which we tried for a while. It drove some traffic our way, but omg, we hated it! We deleted our account the other day. It’s worse than Facebook.
Next was sex. Since we’re gay, that’s kind of implied, right? Sort of? Maybe? As if.
One thing they didn’t mention: obsessively photographing the GWB.
I, too, have an obsession with the George Washington Bridge. However, mine involves a nagging compulsion to complete a football pass from the deck of the bridge to a buddy on the ground below.
Filed under: Architecture, GWB Project, The Gay Recluse, Traffic, Washington Heights | 6 Comments
Tags: Breakthroughs, Rain, Summer, Sunsets, The George Washington Bridge
In which The Gay Recluse sees remnants of craft in the morning commute.
This is where we stand every morning to wait for the train.
And dream of stenciling this pattern onto the walls of our office.
Filed under: Architecture, Capitalism, City Pattern Project, Communism, Photography, Subway, The Gay Recluse, Washington Heights | 1 Comment
Tags: 163rd Street, Art Deco, Grates, Iron Work, MTA, Peeling Paint
In which The Gay Recluse compares and contrasts.
Recently we stumbled across a review of The Curtain, Milan Kundera’s 2007 collection of essays about the art of the novel. We found the review notable 1) for its pretentious language and 2) for its failure to acknowledge what is really a rather shockingly homophobic passage in the book.
Let’s start with the notably pretentious literary review:
… And the curtain itself? As per the fugue-like structure of his essays, Kundera recurs to the idea of the ‘curtain of pre-interpretation‘ – “A magic curtain, woven of legends, hung before the world. Cervantes sent Don Quixote journeying and tore through the curtain. The world opened before the knight errant in all the comical nakedness of its prose.” Here we have presented the elementary beginnings of the novel, its impulse towards demystification. It abolishes the sickly lyricism of the Romantic forms, the solipsism of lyric poetry, and turns its gaze on the world’s festival: “If I imagine the genesis of a novelist in the form of an exemplary tale, a ‘myth’, that genesis looks to me like a conversion story: Saul becoming Paul; the novelist being born from the ruins of his lyrical world.” Tearing the curtain means, among other things, breaching the valances of self-deception, the political lie, delusions about our place in the scheme of things, false consciousness; it means minting afresh our perceptions, besoming clean the lumber-room of our premade assumptions… The novelist is the arch-individualist, the inheritor of a tradition that will not overwhelm and absorb him; a refuser of the obsolescence of the efforts of his forebears (there is much still to learn from the example of Rabelais), one who makes it his business to ‘seek out the never-said’, to bring to bear on human experience articulate energies wrought to a fine pitch; an ironist and humourist in the old style… Cleanly translated by Linda Asher, The Curtainsorts well with the arguments of Kundera’s earlier essays – reads rather as a coda and reprise of them – and confirms him as still one of the most passionately convinced of the novel’s practitioners.
“fugue-like structure of his essays…recurs to the idea…the sickly lyricism…the world’s festival!?” OMG! Barf. Zzzzzzz.
But whatever, we can appreciate pretentious language… but not when it obfuscates a rather important component of the book, which we addressed in our review of The Curtain last year:
We quickly absorbed this staggering piece of prose, in which Kundera explains how, after he discovered Proust in Czech translation as an adolescent (but without knowing anything about the French master), Albertine was “the most captivating of all female names” for him. Unfortunately, he goes on to tell us with something between an embarrassed cough and a sly wink, this bliss (one we readily admit to sharing) did not last: “I myself lost the privilege of that lovely ignorance, when I heard it said that Albertine was inspired by a man, a man Proust was in love with. But what are they talking about!… [O]nce I’d been told that her model was a man that useless information was lodged in my head… A male had slipped between me and Albertine, he was scrambling her image, undermining her femininity. One minute I would see her with pretty breasts, the next with a flat chest, and every now and then a mustache would appear on the delicate skin of her face.” Kundera thus concludes: “They killed my Albertine,” and Proust is thereafter relegated to less than a footnote in Kundera’s estimation of great novelists.
So yes, Kundera makes a very compelling case in this collection of essays that he’s a homophobic asshole. Which is not a problem per se — every artist has faults, and we even enjoyed some of his novels (although it’s hilarious that he would think to criticize Proust about anything) — but it’s emblematic of the state of literature in general that this kind of homophobic episode is brushed under the rug in pretentious literary reviews such as the above. We’re not saying it has to be front and center, but it’s irresponsible for a critic (whether gay/straight/whatever) not to at least acknowledge the point, e.g, “An accomplished novelist, Kundera has some interesting ideas about the novel, although it’s worth noting that in this collection of essays he embarrasses himself a few times by revealing himself to be a homophobic asshole.” Otherwise we might be inclined to think that the reviewer is also a homophobic asshole, or at least a very oblivious one.
Filed under: Conspiracy, Dissonance, Drivel, Language, Literature, Pessimism, The Gay Recluse, Writers-French | 14 Comments
Tags: Critics, Homophobia, Milan Kundera, The Curtain
In which The Gay Recluse becomes increasingly obsessed with The George Washington Bridge.
Time of Photographs: June 16, 2008 — dusk.
We find these clouds infinitely fascinating.
Others may find them ugly or unattractive.
We can accept that.
“The George Washington Bridge over the Hudson is the most beautiful bridge in the world. Made of cables and steel beams, it gleams in the sky like a reversed arch. It is blessed. It is the only seat of grace in the disordered city. It is painted an aluminum color and, between water and sky, you see nothing but the bent cord supported by two steel towers. When your car moves up the ramp the two towers rise so high that it brings you happiness; their structure is so pure, so resolute, so regular that here, finally, steel architecture seems to laugh. The car reaches an unexpectedly wide apron; the second tower is very far away; innumerable vertical cables, gleaming against the sky, are suspended from the magisterial curve which swings down and then up. The rose-colored towers of New York appear, a vision whose harshness is mitigated by distance.”
– Le Corbusier, When the Cathedrals Were White, 1947.
Filed under: Architecture, GWB Project, The Gay Recluse, Washington Heights, Weather | Leave a Comment
Tags: Clouds, Dusk, June, Le Corbusier, The George Washington Bridge
On a Sudden Yet Completely Explicable Desire To Tell the Central Park Conservancy To Shut Up
In which The Gay Recluse asks The Central Park Conservancy to rethink its mailing-list purchases.
So a few days ago we received a personal note from Douglas Blonsky, President, Central Park Conservancy and Central Park Administrator. Here it is, with our favorite excerpts!
Dear Matthew:
I imagine you treasure Central Park for the oasis that it is, particularly because you live nearby in the Washington Heights area.
With its beauty, open green spaces, and recreational opportunities, Central Park is your urban sanctuary… a place where New Yorkers like you can get away from it all.
And since you live so close to the Park, I’m hoping you’ll do your part to support the Central Park Conservancy so that we can continue to keep Central Park clean and beautiful…
When you send a gift to the Conservancy, you will be affirming that Central Park matters to you…that as a member of the Washington Heights community, you are doing your part to help preserve this urban sanctuary.
Central Park is considered the crown jewel of public urban parks. And you are so lucky you live 60 blocks away so close by.
As a New Yorker, you may remember or have heard about the state of Washington Heights Central Park before the Conservancy was founded. Years of neglect in the 1960s and 1970s and 1980s and 1990s and 2000s had taken their toll and this once-great landmark was on the brink of destruction. Its trees and gardens were untended. Its buildings were falling apart. Even the Jumel Mansion — the oldest free-standing house in Manhattan, where George Washington slept in the Revolutionary War — barely had enough money for a gardener. Museums staffed by racist directors fled the neighborhood. Its trees and gardens were untended. Its lawns were bare dirt and dustbowls. Its bridges and buildings were covered with graffiti, its statues defaced, and its benches falling apart.
I hope you will help us, because this is not only America’s greatest urban park — it is your neighborhood park too. So please, let me hear from you soon.
Thanks for the letter, CPC. Consider us heard from.
Oh and for pictures of the ruined state of parks uptown, click here.
Filed under: Architecture, Capitalism, Communism, Conspiracy, Dissonance, Drivel, New York City, Resignation, Ruins, The Gay Recluse, Washington Heights | 4 Comments
Tags: Central Park Conservancy, Douglas Blonsky, Fundraising
In which The Gay Recluse goes to the museum.
Consider the old panels on the subway platform wall, and observe the finely wrought precision with which each strip of peeling paint has by the hands of time been distressed in the subtlest shades of gold and silver, all displayed in a collage with the glue and paper of generations long deceased. We know there will be many who fail to see the beauty of these forgotten panels, and will respond to our assessment with scorn and disbelief. Yet before you judge, we again invite to you to behold the works in person. Here you have the abstract expression of the city itself, resplendent in decay and neglect, and to observe it for even these few seconds fills us with the transcendent bliss of true insignificance.
– The Gay Recluse, September 2007
Filed under: Architecture, Decay, New York City, Subway, The Gay Recluse, Washington Heights | 3 Comments
Tags: Art, Masterpieces, MTA, Museums, Subway
In which The Gay Recluse becomes increasingly obsessed with the George Washington Bridge.
Date of Photographs: June 15, afternoon.
We’d like to introduce you to George Washington Bridge, our longtime companion.
Yes, it’s our husband.
It’s our wife and it’s our life.
“I, too am obsessed with the George Washington Bridge, and have been ever since as stoned youths me and my friends cavorted in the park on the New Jersey side that is directly below the place where the roadway meets the land. We were convinced that the Bridge is the largest thing in the world. For a true enthusiast such as yourself, I strongly recommend a stroll across the span, and then a picnic lunch along the walking paths underneath. Disclaimer: individual results may vary; inebriants are recommended to enhance the forcefulness of the desired optical effects.”
– The Blind Architect, 2008.
Filed under: Architecture, Good Rock, GWB Project, The Gay Recluse, Washington Heights | Leave a Comment
Tags: Heroine, The George Washington Bridge, The Velvet Underground



























































On a Brief Note about “On the Opinion Page”
In which The Gay Recluse responds to a comment.
Today reader Wayward Son sent us the following note:
I miss your opinion on opinion pieces. Lately I have been forced to read them myself. That means I am apt to accidentally take them seriously as I am without your sometimes satirical, sometimes facetious, always spot-on opinion on opinion pieces. I want more OOOPS in my blog reading please.
First of all, thanks for the kind words, Wayward Son. But for the moment, we are going to continue our hiatus at least through the Fourth of July and possibly through Labor Day, at which point we expect the election to take front and center, and we hope to have recovered enough from our first foray into the opinion pages to try a second!
Filed under: Politicians, The Gay Recluse, The Times | 3 Comments
Tags: Nice Commenters, Opinions, The New York Times