In which The Gay Recluse turns forty.

Today we received the following note from Harry, a reader in Washington Heights:

Subj: YOU

Mess: It is none my business to know, but! My curiosity is tweaked. Who are you? Have you posted something somewhere to give a more detailed bio? or do I have to continue to read between the lines for any crumbs of information?
FYI i am an 80 year old autistic gay man who enjoys reading your piece every day. And yes, life is still fun?
#####

Thanks, Harry — let’s just say that it is our pleasure to hear from a representative of what we have to believe is an underserved demographic, particularly on the internet. (!) Somewhat more seriously, we recently marked our fortieth year with a walk through the ruins of Washington Heights (and Inwood), which as usual was both exhilarating and depressing; or in short: fun? We present this to you below in annotated fashion, with the hope that it may give you some insight into what you are seeking to know. (Or it may bore you to tears, in which case we apologize in advance!).

Forty Years in Broken Lampposts
Date of Photos: March 22-23, 2008
Location: Fort Tryon Park and Inwood Hill Park, Manhattan.

Year 1. Our parents were noble and flawed.

Year 2. Of course we looked just like them.

Year 3. Most of our earliest memories have been replaced by photographs.

Year 4. Except for the hours we spent in the dark, hidden in the back of our parents’ closets. The smell of the clothes — the rows of dresses and pants — was intoxicating!

Year 5. The first day of school.

Year 6. We were annoyingly painfully shy. An invitation to Howard Feldman’s birthday party was the scariest thing in the world! We begged our mother not to make us go, and she made a deal: as long as we were willing to deliver the present to the front door, we wouldn’t have to go inside. We can still remember the terror of pressing the doorbell and looking in side at Howard’s house, teeming with kids. We handed Mrs. Feldman the present and left.

Year 7. In second grade we called a girl we hated a “faggot.” Our friend Danny Wexler was there to correct us: “A girl can’t be a faggot!” “Why not?” we asked but he didn’t offer an explanation: “Call her a bitch!” he said and somehow we knew he wasn’t kidding.

Year 8. Our third grade teacher was a man who couldn’t spell “recipe.” He wore cologne until they discovered it was making Annabelle Mayson throw up.

Year 9. Every morning in fourth grade we listened to that song by Queen: “We Will Rock You.” Our friend Howard played air guitar during the solo at the end and instead of listening to the embarrassingly schmaltzy second half (“We Are The Champions”), we just would start it over again from the beginning.

Year 10. In fifth grade we became depressed for no reason anyone could figure out. We received perfect marks at school, had lots of friends and played on the travel hockey team. Secretly we were sleeping with knives and sipping cleaning supplies.

Year 11. A lot of kids were “going out” but we remained aloof and terrified, especially when we learned that Molly Lerch liked us.

Year 12. Seventh grade was kind of scary, especially when the eighth graders threw Randy Williams off the balcony and broke his collarbone because he wore white socks on “8-A Day.”

Year 13. We read The Iliad in eighth grade, but nobody mentioned anything about what was really going on with Achilles and Patroclus.

Year 14. In ninth grade we spent a lot of time staring at the crotch of our social studies teacher. He had a pot belly and would sort of slide his hands under his belt as he sat in the front of the room talking about the Steelers.

Year 15. In tenth grade we went to Cranbrook, a boarding school that — in terms of certain things — was nothing like the English version. (Or if it was, we were too busy playing hockey to notice.)

Year 16. This was the year our hockey “career” began to fall apart. Even though our team won “the states,” we spent most of the season on the fourth line, an effective demotion from the year before. Our coach insisted we had talent but lacked a killer instinct. Obviously he was not wrong.

Year 17. Calling our father after we decided to quit playing hockey was actually harder than “coming out” would be twelve years later.

Year 18. We next went to Cornell, which like us at the time was rather soulless.

Year 19. We majored in government and slowly dreamed of ingratiating ourselves to the arty kids who hung out in the Dragon. Hilariously, we thought they were subversive.

Year 20. This was the year that could be summed up by The Minutemen classic: “Maybe Partying Will Help.”

Year 21. In retrospect, Cornell really was a waste of time (and $$$$ — sorry Dad!)

Year 22. Like millions of others, we moved to Washington, DC and worked for environmental groups (Center for Marine Conservation, Institute for Local Self-Reliance, etc.) run by scary egomaniacs who for some reason are good at raising $$$$.

Year 23. We hatched a plan to move to New York City. (Law school — ugh.)

Year 24. Law school was filled with very smart people who actually cared about studying and getting high-paying jobs!

Year 25. For a while we pretended that we wanted to be a “public-interest” lawyer, until we realized that they also worked insanely hard and for almost no money! Yuck! We started a band that was effectively a Galaxie 500 knock-off.

Year 26. Graduation from law school. Our classmates start at ___, __ & ___, while we take a job at a Soho record store — Rocks in Your Head — and go on sporadic tours playing for nobody in places like Buffalo and Panama City. We witness a bloodbath in Milwaukee after a fight breaks out in the room where everyone is hanging out (i.e., not the one where we were playing.) Apparently a black guy walked into the bar and a white guy didn’t like that he was black. Who knew that Milwaukee was like the Balkans of race relations? Our mind is racing as the sirens wail out front: was this ever covered on Laverne & Shirley?

Year 27. We are living in Brooklyn during this phase of our life.

Year 28. There are secret trysts via the personals.

Year 29. We begin attending our friends’ weddings with increasing frequency and corresponding alarm.

Year 30. We write embarrassingly earnest paragraphs in our journal about wanting to jump off the Verrazano Bridge in the middle of traffic. (As a long-time indie rocker, we are not familiar with the term “drama queen”!)

Year 31. We finally come out. Phew.

Year 32. Oddly, the world doesn’t really care!

Year 33. We take our first “real” job in _______, an industry filled with women and gays who work for nothing. (Ok, it’s publishing.)

Year 34. By this point we are living in Washington Heights.

Year 35. A business deal we made with a Cornell friend goes sour. There is a lawsuit.

Year 36. There is family turmoil.

Year 37. There is therapy!!!

Year 38. There is resolution on all fronts.

Year 39. We don’t believe in life, but we don’t not believe in it, either.

Year 40. There is (sometimes!) even relief. And yes, life is still fun?
add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse contemplates an uncommissioned masterpiece from the walls of an uptown subway station.

Consider, if you will, one of the old panels on the subway platform wall, and observe the finely wrought precision with which each strip of peeling paint has by the hands of time been distressed in the subtlest shades of gold and silver, all displayed in a collage with the glue and paper of generations long deceased. We know there will be many who fail to see the beauty of these forgotten panels, and will respond to our assessment with scorn and disbelief. Yet before you judge, we again invite to you to behold the works in person. Here you have the abstract expression of the city itself, resplendent in decay and neglect, and to observe it for even these few seconds fills us with the transcendent bliss of true insignificance.

– The Gay Recluse, September 2007

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse becomes increasingly obsessed with The George Washington Bridge.

Time and Date of photograph: March 31, 2008, 9:48am.

Notes: The gray tone of the sky nearly matched that of the bridge.

“The George Washington Bridge over the Hudson is the most beautiful bridge in the world. Made of cables and steel beams, it gleams in the sky like a reversed arch. It is blessed. It is the only seat of grace in the disordered city. It is painted an aluminum color and, between water and sky, you see nothing but the bent cord supported by two steel towers. When your car moves up the ramp the two towers rise so high that it brings you happiness; their structure is so pure, so resolute, so regular that here, finally, steel architecture seems to laugh. The car reaches an unexpectedly wide apron; the second tower is very far away; innumerable vertical cables, gleaming against the sky, are suspended from the magisterial curve which swings down and then up. The rose-colored towers of New York appear, a vision whose harshness is mitigated by distance.”

– Le Corbusier, When the Cathedrals Were White, 1947.

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse holds a contest. Sort of.

Last week our newest correspondent The Blind Architect filed this report:

You may be interested in this statue of George Washington I saw last week in Seattle. No musculature, but he does have a big sword. I have been watching the HBO John Adams series, and George Washington (played by David Morse) is portrayed as a great historical figure, so I am inspired to root for his inclusion in your contest.

Ok, TBA, let’s check it out!

Hmmm. We see what you’re saying about the sword, but this could be a lot gayer, actually.

The Blind Architect followed up with this:

There are some sculptures of George Washington that are hotter than the one from Seattle. Check out the father of our country below. Not exactly a six-pack, but admirable pecs and biceps, wouldn’t you say? And what’s that he’s holding? And OMG…what’s up with all of the swords?

We agree. From the neck down, this George is not only gay, but actually kinda hot! (?) (And how about those feet!) Still, we’re not exactly in love with his face, which gives us the sense that he partied a bit too much for his own good a few decades ago.

We look forward to hearing more from The Blind Architect. In the meantime, we have our own obviously-gay-but-not exactly-hot George to add to the mix, this one from the Pittsburgh International Airport, where we recently had the pleasure of spending a few minutes.

“My name is George Washington. My truth is that I am a gay American.”

We’re proud of him for finally admitting it!

Although it’s safe to say that none of these statues are going to win any awards, we are nonetheless inspired by the growing recognition that the father of our country was clearly gay if not exactly hot. Are we missing any hot Georges out there? And what about Abraham Lincoln, the gayest greatest president of all time? We encourage everyone to keep your eyes open.

The Hot Gay Statue Contest Roundup:

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse scores selected opinion pieces in The Times.

Paul Krugman/The Dilbert Strategy

The Short Version: Any “reform” of the financial markets proposed by the Bush administration is a joke.

In his words: “Oh, and the Bush administration actively blocked state governments when they tried to protect families against predatory lending.”

Score: B (Basic)
There’s nothing surprising about this column, but there’s nothing really wrong with it, either.

William Kristol/Biography Isn’t Enough

The Short Version: Behold the Maverick!

In his words: “As an elected official, [McCain has] never rested on his P.O.W. laurels, remarkable though they are.”

The Score: D (Dumb)
Total puff piece on The Maverick. Expect this column to be repeated at least fifty more times in as many weeks.

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse scores selected opinion pieces in The Times.

Frank Rich/Hillary’s St. Patrick’s Day Massacre

The Short Version: Why is Hillary such a lying liar? To cover up her Iraq vote, of course!

In his words: “Incredible as it seems, the professionals around Mrs. Clinton — though surely knowing her story was false — thought she could tough it out.”

Score: B (Belligerent)
That Rich wants Clinton to go down as a result of her Iraq stance is hardly news, but the psychology of her idiotic Bosnia lie is interesting in a Frank Rich kind of way.

Nicholas Kristof/”With a Few More Brains…

The Short Version: Americans are so stupid!

In his words: “Alas, when a politician has the double disadvantage of obvious intelligence and an elite education and then on top of that tries to educate the public on a complex issue — as Al Gore did about climate change — then that candidate is derided as arrogant and out of touch.”

The Score: D (Dumb)
Alas, whenever we read Kristof — and this column was no exception — we wonder how he was ever hired to write for The Times, because he is so arrogant and out of touch. (Also: we recommend a ban on any sentence in which he uses either “whites” or “blacks” in an unironic sense.)

Maureen Dowd/Surrender Already, Dorothy

The Short Version: Obama and Clinton are both getting on my nerves! (But Clinton’s worse, of course.)

In her words: “Her foreign affairs plumping-up has hurt her, while his exotic and unorthodox narrative stirs doubt.”

The Score: D (Desultory)
Dowd seems a bit aimless in this column and doesn’t really say anything we don’t already know.

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse posts love letters from crazies.

Remember a couple hundred years ago when Arthur C. Clarke died and we made fun of him for being a closet case? And how not everyone thought it was funny and we laughed at them too? Well, some people are still upset and can’t resist sending us hateful hilarious letters that don’t say much about Arthur C. Clarke, but do prove that there are a lot of crazies out there!

Here’s one of the best, which just arrived from reader Vee Anibal (veeanibal@gmail.com):

Your “obituaries” of Sir Arthur C. Clarke, besides being the “work” of filthy copycats, are nauseating.

You seem to find it impossible to respect anything or anyone.
Your aim seems to be only to slander, to smear, to defame!
You cannot stand to see there are men of a far higher level than yours!

SHAME ON YOU, BUNCH OF BASTARDLY, STINKING FAGS!!!!

Thanks, Vee! Although you’re clearly crazy and we recommend you check yourself into an institution asap (remember to tell them you’re probably a closet-case?), we appreciate the input and are even considering a few of your more inspired lines for a new slogan.

The Gay Recluse: Your Favorite Filthy Copycat
The Gay Recluse: Here To Nauseate You
The Gay Recluse: To Slander, To Smear, To Defame!
The Gay Recluse: We’re Bastards, We Stink, We’re Fags

If anyone else has any ideas, we’d obviously love to hear from you!

The Arthur C. Clarke Roundup:
The Times obit.
Our version of the Times obit.
The AP obit.
Our version of the AP obit.
One reader response we particularly liked.

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse scores selected opinion pieces in The Times.

Gail Collins/McCain Forecloses Early

The Short Version: Democrats need to relax. McCain is truly an idiot!

In her words: “Fortunately for the quivering Democrats, McCain has also felt compelled to speak about the mortgage crisis.”

Score: A (Awesome)
Collins delivers a much needed (and amusing!) perspective in the middle of Obama-Clinton hysteria.

Timothy Egan/Disorder on the Border

The Short Version: Arizona is so fucking great!!!

In his words: “Arizona may produce the next president, in John McCain, or the next vice president, in Janet Napolitano, the Democratic governor.”

The Score: D- (Dumb)
Egan examines the reality of immigration policy in Arizona and wants readers to be impressed with his observation that the reality doesn’t conform with either asshole Republican (“build the wall!”) or liberal Democrat (“open the borders”) ideologies. His point is that _____.

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse updates his informal but rather telling quantitative analysis of Modern Love, the weekly Style Section (of The Times) column in which openly gay writers almost never appear, and even less frequently describe a romantic relationship.

This week’s piece: How We Got from Grief to Pancakes

Subject: A woman finds a new spouse after her first one died. For our gay alternative, click here.

Filed under: Straight Woman on Relationships

The updated tally (or why we feel like animals in the zoo): 6 out of 172 columns by openly gay writers; 1 out of 172 on female gay relationships; 0 out of 172 on male gay relationships. In what is arguably the “gayest” section of The Times, more women have written about gay men than gay men have.

Outstanding question to Daniel Jones, editor of Modern Love: WTF?

Straight Woman on Relationships iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii (40)
Straight Woman on Family iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii (35)
Straight Woman on “Looking for Love” iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iii (33)
Straight Woman on Breaking Up iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iii (23)
Straight Man on Relationships iiiii iiiii i (11)
Straight Man on Breakup iiiiii (6)
Straight Woman on Gay Men iiiii i (6)
Straight Man on Family iiiii i(6)
Straight Man on “Looking for Love” iiiii (5)
Gay Man on Family ii (2)
Gay Woman on Relationship i (1)
Gay Woman on Family i (1)
Gay Man on Self-Hatred i (1)
Gay Man on Prom Date i (1)
Ambiguous/Nurse on Drugs i (1)


add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse provides a gay alternative to this week’s Modern Love offering in The Times. Those looking for our quantitative analysis should click here.

How We Got From Grief to Pancakes

By PATTY DANN and THE GAY RECLUSE

Published: March 30, 2008

I WAS nervous about meeting my new partner’s parents, even though — omg! — I’m old enough to be a grandmother. When I told a friend I was marrying again, she said, “What? And lose your widow status?” (She’s always been kind of a bitch, but I like her anyway!)

My first partner, Willa, died eight years ago of brain cancer. She was 50, Dutch, a marathon runner, as graceful as a heron. Then one day, while a spring breeze rustled the curtains, she gazed at me and said meekly, “Who are you?” (Let’s just say this was NOT a good phase of my life.)

Anyway. I’m now older than she was when she died, as is my new partner, Michelle. (For all you math whizzes out there, that means we’re both over 50 — yikes!) Anyway, what’s kinda scary is that I keep a wedding photograph of Michelle and her late partner Nancy, a beautiful reddish blonde, on my bureau and they look really young! Some people find it strange that I would have such a photo on my bureau. I do not. What’s strange is that I obsess about it constantly! (Kidding!) Seriously, these people are our stories, our past, and the parents of our children. (Uggh, pinch me the next time I get all “literary”!)

Anyway. “You have to meet my parents,” my new partner Michelle groaned several months ago. I had seen pictures of them but had thus far been spared the agony. Her asshole father, at 84, is a federal judge — Zzzzzzz — still active on the bench. Her mother, who had been a ballet dancer, is still married to him. (Which is really sad because Michelle is like 98 percent sure her mother had a lesbian love affair in her twenties, like right after she moved to Atlanta.)

Not that anyone talks about that! Accordingly to Michelle, they like to tell everyone that they fell in love and left their small towns in South Carolina to go to the big city of Atlanta; that they were a mythical couple whose friends soaped “Just Married” all over their 1940 Plymouth; that they washed it off, but the “Just Married” message on the roof remained, faded but defiant, baked into the paint and reappearing whenever it rained. The first time I heard this, I was like: how awesome would it have been if the word “lesbian” had appeared instead! LOL! Whatever — tragic case. They’ve been married for 60 years and — sadly but not surprisingly — the ballet dancer’s mind is fading.

I wanted to be nice, though, so I brought her pink ribbons for toeshoes as a gift, to see if she remembers, the color perhaps, a sensual memory from long ago, twirling and smiling in the sunlight. Anything to forget her arrogant husband!

But wait! I forgot to tell you about the first time my son met Michelle’s two boys and they all nodded, “Hey,” and went off into the summer night to play badminton down the street. When they came back sweaty, two hours later, I longed to ask the crickets what the boys had talked about. I scanned their tired faces, desperate for a sign. Did they like one another? Would it be O.K.?

The next morning I asked my son, “What do you think of the big boys?”

“Good,” he said, obviously lying to please me.

“Their mother died,” I said.

“No duh,” he shrugged. “So did mine.”

Wait, what was I talking about? Oh yeah, meeting Michelle’s parents. Like I was saying: what would my future mother-in-law think of me, a New York girl?

“She might be very cordial when you meet and then five minutes later ask who you are,” Michelle said.

“Could be worse,” I said quietly. I understood. “At least she can’t kick you out of the house anymore!”

Anyway, I have two fears:

1. Of learning to be a family again.

2. Of becoming a widow again.

I admit in the cold winters of the recent years, many nights I let my son sit on the radiator eating macaroni and cheese as we watched the shittiest show ever: “Supernanny.” We were junkies! But even though the children on the show were holy terrors, at least they always had two parents. We kinda longed for unruly. In the days after Willa died, my son would march off to preschool and call out, “Get me a new Mom while I’m at school.”

Here’s how that happened: I wrote a book about Willa dying and Michelle, who is a journalist in Baltimore, felt compelled in the wake of her partner’s death to read books on grief, which obviously hadn’t been my “response.” (Don’t you love psychobabble words like “response”? LOL!) It was all I could do in those days to make a stupid cow costume for my son’s school play. But whatever, my publisher forwarded me a link to an essay Michelle published about grieving, which included a review of my book.

I read it online at 2 a.m., sitting alone in my nightgown, barefoot and shivering, on a winter night last year. Reading it, I felt a complete love for her late partner, Nancy, who was an art historian, just as Willa had been. (Honestly, how freaked out was I?)

In the essay, which included reviews of a few of the more important works in the growing cottage industry of “widowed writers,” Michelle quoted a passage of mine about a widower I had met as a teenager who still had his dead wife’s clothes in his closet. I had been spooked at the time, never imagining that at age 46 I would have a closetful of a dead partner’s clothes, that I would be a lesbian and that it would seem right.

I rather stiffly wrote to her: “Dear Ms. Hill, It’s an honor to be included with such wonderful writers. I am sorry for your loss.”

At least she wrote back, commenting on the passage in my book where I describe how I kept buying basil at the grocery store the summer Willa was dying, and how the smell of basil got me through those months. Since her partner died, she wrote, she didn’t think she could plant a garden again. You know how crazy gardeners are.

Soon we were exchanging e-mail messages with “re: grief” in the subject line. We corresponded for two months, starting with those first cold weeks when Michelle would return to her empty home with her children off at college, and now Nancy gone, and struggle to shovel the icy driveway. Eventually the subject lines changed to “re: thumb-stack of pancakes” and “re: bolts of cloth.” For some reason, I was touched!

One night my son appeared at my desk at midnight, when I thought he was asleep, while I was writing restless e-mail messages.

“I see how you get, all flirty-flirty with Michelle,” he announced. He didn’t actually say “flirty-flirty” but I always tell the story like that cause I think it sounds cute! LOL!

Anyway. Michelle was coming to New York in a few weeks, to see Joan Didion’s play “The Year of Magical Thinking.” Did I want to get together for coffee? I agreed to meet her at the Morgan Library.

Two days later I panicked. “I have a middle school meeting all day,” I boldly lied. “Perhaps another time.”

But then my friend the bitch advised: “Go. You’ve been scared your whole life. Go.”

Another eqally bitchy friend said: “A lesbian in a 27-year relationship will never get over her partner. Aren’t you jealous?”

“No, and fuck off!” I said. “I already love Nancy. She would have been my friend, and probably my ex, too! I don’t want Michelle to let her go. The four of us would have been friends.”

My friend was like: “Isn’t that kind of ‘Our Charty’?” which ok, was kind of funny.

But whatev, I wrote Michelle and told her I could get away for an hour. “How will I recognize you?” I asked.

“I’m 5-9 and need a haircut,” she replied. “I’ll be wearing a baseball hat. And you?”

Typically — because it was my first date in like a zillion years and I was nervous, so whatever! — I wrote something non-responsive, non-linear, stilted and rather confusing: “Years ago, when I was in Oklahoma, I met a woman who said: ‘You look like Bonnie, you know, Bonnie and Clyde. She was a little woman like you, with messy hair.’ ” Ridiculously I added, “Not Faye Dunaway.”

I waited nervously at the door of the Morgan Library until a woman of Michelle’s description walked in. I leaned forward and put out my hand. “Michelle?” I said.

“Yes,” she said, shaking my hand. We talked for several minutes and realized we had dated like 100 years ago. She said, “I’m sorry, but why are we here now?” And we realized — omg! — she was not the Michelle I thought she was. I was relieved and disappointed. This was a nice woman, and even kinda hot, but I felt no magic. I was “Ex-hausted” LOL!!!!

Five minutes later another woman in a baseball hat walked through the door. This was the woman I had been writing to day and night for two months, who liked the words “bolts of cloth” as much as I did. (Don’t ask.)

We did not look at any exhibits at the Morgan Library. I cannot even tell you what the exhibits were. Instead we sat side-by-side at these weird things called “computers,” — I am so not into technology, LOL — clicking randomly on virtual tours, and showing each other JPEGs of our sons.

“Don’t you have to get back to the middle school meeting?” Michelle asked over lunch, while I pushed my food around. (Btw, the food at the Morgan Library? Ew.)

“No, somebody can tell me about it,” I demurred, staring at her…wrists. (lol!)

Our second date, I met her at Penn Station under what we’ve come to call the “flip-flip sign.” (I can’t decide if that’s funny, but whatev.) Then we walked west and she took my hand. While buying tickets for the Circle Line around Manhattan, I confessed to her that there had been no middle school meeting. (As a wise-ass friend had said to me: “There are no all-day middle school meetings. Couldn’t you have come up with something better than that?”)

As we filed onto the boat, a photographer took our picture. We sat on deck in the sunlight, with all sorts of idiotic Germans and Japanese seated next to us. The breeze was soft; the guide made garbled announcements about Henry Hudson and the Little Red Lighthouse (let me pause here to give a shout out to all my peeps in WAHI!!! LOL!!!), and Michelle touched the back of my neck. When we got off the boat all the photos of the passengers were hanging up for sale. There we were, a middle-aged lesbian couple with two dead partners, but yes, in love. All together now: awwww. Sweet, right?

Anyway. LAST week I met her parents. Don’t worry: I was nice. I gave the mother — who btw was totally fried — the pink toeshoe ribbons. She thanked me, taking them lightly in her fingers. I even reintroduced myself to her each time I entered the room. When it was time for me to return to New York, Michelle’s blowhard father hugged me and said in his South Carolina drawl, “Welcome to the family.” I was like in your dreams, buddy, but I just smiled!

I told her mother I loved her daughter. I felt bad for her, honestly, married for six decades to that blowhard asshole! Jesus. I’d lose my mind, too.

“We enjoyed having you here. We’ll miss you,” said her mother somewhat automatically, holding the pink toeshoe ribbons, although it was not at all clear to me if she remembered sewing similar ones to toeshoes long ago. Like I said, she was seriously out to lunch, the poor thing.

Anyway. It is almost time for Michelle to plant her spring garden. A button broke on the cuff of her shirt recently, and as she stood with the cracked button in the palm of her hand like an offering, I could see her missing Nancy. I kinda missed her too! OMG! Is that crazy?

I hesitated, then went into the back of my closet and pulled out one of Willa’s flannel shirts. Although I’m no Betsy Ross, I retrieved my box of sewing things, full of threads and needles from Willa’s mother’s Dutch sewing kit. (So I guess I kind of am Betsy Ross! LOL!)

Working carefully with like the tiniest scissors ever, I snipped a button off Willa’s shirt and sewed it onto Michelle’s cuff. OMG, I thought, they’re like both so totally butch. Love it. Love. It. Don’t you?

Patty Dann lives in New York City. Her latest book is “The Goldfish Went on Vacation” ( Trumpeter, 2007).

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse contemplates an uncommissioned masterpiece from the walls of an uptown subway station.

Consider, if you will, one of the old panels on the subway platform wall, and observe the finely wrought precision with which each strip of peeling paint has by the hands of time been distressed in the subtlest shades of gold and silver, all displayed in a collage with the glue and paper of generations long deceased. We know there will be many who fail to see the beauty of these forgotten panels, and will respond to our assessment with scorn and disbelief. Yet before you judge, we again invite to you to behold the works in person. Here you have the abstract expression of the city itself, resplendent in decay and neglect, and to observe it for even these few seconds fills us with the transcendent bliss of true insignificance.

— The Gay Recluse, September 2007

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse scores selected opinion pieces in The Times.

Paul Krugman/Loans and Leadership

The Short Version: When you look at policy proposals, McCain is a Nazi, Clinton is progressive and Obama (who annoys me just because) is less progressive.

In his words: “McCain is selling the same old snake oil, claiming that deregulation and tax cuts cure all ills.”

Score: B- (Bland)
This column is annoying to the extent that Krugman seems to think he was the only person in the United States who wasn’t surprised that Bush turned out to be a Nazi despite all of his campaign promises about being a “moderate.” Whatever. We hated Ronald Reagan Bush even from the time he was governor of California Texas. That quibble aside, we basically agree with Krugman about McCain/Clinton/Obama but think that he discounts too heavily the psychology of politics; although it makes logical sense to look at their proposals — like, no duh — it’s also true that some people have a way of getting things done with greater efficiency and style, and so far, Obama’s campaign seems a bit more lithe than Clinton’s, which could be just as telling as their position papers with regard to how their respective administrations would actually run.

David Brooks/Tested Over Time

The Short Version: The Maverick is not a hawk!

In his words: “This was not the speech of a man who thinks military force is the answer to every problem.”

The Score: D (Disingenuous)
We will concede that if George Bush is a zero on a scale of 1 (worst) to 10 (best) on foreign policy issues, than The Maverick is in fact more nuanced and flexible, and therefore merits a 1. This is not a reason to vote for him, obviously.

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which the Gay Recluse holds a contest. Sort of.

Although this is not an official submission, we felt it was imperative to share a comment from reader GenghisKuhn in response to Seth Tisue’s entry from Philadelphia (shown below).

Genghis writes:

What makes this even funnier is that it looks like the J-Man might be involved, reminiscent of this hilarious piece of art (I tried to find a larger one, but YOU try google image searching “jesus+gay”):

Thanks, Genghis! We apologize to readers already familiar with this image, but it was new to us and we thought it would also be useful to remind everyone — despite the whole church-state-separation thing — not to overlook hilarious hot gay religious statuary! Many places of worship can be considered quasi-public to the extent you can go in and look around for free; we have to believe a treasure trove of hot gay statuary exists within these holy confines! (That said, we want to see it.)

The Hot Gay Statue Contest Roundup:

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse scores selected opinion pieces in The Times.

Gail Collins/The Uncle Al Election

The Short Version: Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are politicians; ergo they act like politicians.

In her words: “There isn’t a right or wrong to this argument — only strategy.”

Score: A- (Aware)
Although we’re not always in love with Collins’ somewhat precious sense of humor, it cannot be denied that she has emerged as a voice of reason in the Hillary-Barack battle. We, too, prefer Obama, but think that Democrats need to remember that either candidate would be 1,000,000,000,000,000 (one trillion) times better than George Bush & Co, not to mention The Maverick.

Nicholas Kristof/Obama, Clinton — And Echoes of Nader?

The Short Version: Hillary Clinton should stop being such a naughty little girl.

In his words: “All this means that Mrs. Clinton’s chances of winning are negligible, barring some major development.”

The Score: F (Failure)
Kristof basically presents a Yahoo news item about the math of superdelegates favoring Obama and then unveils the shocking conclusion that if Clinton doesn’t withdraw, she might — zomg! — be the new Nader. It’s becoming increasingly apparent to us that the op-ed writers on The Times don’t read each other’s pieces as a rule, because this is basically a tepid rehash of Frank Rich’s column from Sunday, but done in Kristof’s typically sanctimonious prose. Yuck.

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse posts news and analysis from our U.K. correspondent, The London Eye.

Today we received this missive from The London Eye:

Dear Gay Recluse: Here are a few more London statues… Even though we’re not eligible for awards, we want the United States to know that our statues are HERE, our statues are QUEER, and our statues are IN YOUR FACE.

Hmm. We understand that The London Eye (who we have reason to believe is a closeted football fan, by which we don’t mean “soccer”) is trying to taunt us with this schoolyard language, but we nevertheless remain quite sensitive to the issue! (And as we all know, The London Eye is not one to deliver empty threats.) Let’s ponder the evidence. (Our language — in case it wasn’t obvious — in itals.)

1. FDR and Churchill on Old Bond Street.

While cruising for anonymous sex, FDR inadvertently picks up Winston Churchill. (They’re both relieved that Stalin isn’t around, since he tends to play a little too rough.)
NUDE – No
GAY – Yes
HOT – No

Excellent analysis, London Eye! Also, because this statue is not very hot, we are not particularly disturbed by its “tiny size.”

2. “Homage to Leonardo” in Belgrave Square.

This image looks hot on paper, but creepy in three dimensions.
NUDE – Yes
GAY – Yes
HOT – No

Yikes. Creepy is right. We’re not sure which is less hot: having eight arms and legs or that haircut!? We wouldn’t want to run into this guy in a dark alley, that’s for sure.

3. “Eros” in Piccadilly Circus

Description: What could be more “erotic” than the hot little twink himself? (Actually, this statue was intended to represent Eros’ twin Anteros, the personification of unrequited love. But that’s even hotter, for some reason.)
NUDE – Yes (except for that strategically placed bit of robe)
GAY – Yes
HOT – Yes

Whoa! Nice work, London Eye! Needless to say, we’re convinced. This statue is definitely one of the gayest and most smokin’ hot we’ve seen to date. Like you said, it’s a good thing London isn’t eligible to win! You guys are truly in a different league.

Or are they? We’ve seen some pretty hot entries from the United States, and like to think that we’ve barely scratched the surface. Readers: help us prove The London Eye wrong! (We would also like to hear from our neighbors to the north and south, obviously.) Will we always be doomed to lag behind Europe in this most important measure of national identity and well-being? Stay tuned for more.

The Hot Gay Statue Contest Roundup:

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse scores selected opinion pieces in The Times.

Maureen Dowd/Hillary or Nobody

The Short Version: Hillary probably doesn’t want to be vice-president.

In her words: “It’s hard to imagine that after spending her whole life playing second-fiddle to a superstar pol, Hillary wants to do it again. She’s been vice president.”

Score: B (Boring for the most part)
Add Dowd to the chorus of voices who claim that Hillary (and Bill) Clinton would rather destroy the Democratic party (and see McCain for four years) than see Obama get the nomination. Although this column is not unamusing at times — e.g., the way Dowd now calls Clinton “The Terminator” — we still don’t buy the premise that Clinton needs to do anything but go down fighting, or that doing so will ultimately wound Obama in the general election. If Obama can beat Clinton, McCain should be a piece of cake.

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse dreams of stowing away.

There are hundreds of barges that pass by each day.

All of them seem to have cool apartments on board.

We dream of sailing to Australia to visit The Cannanes.

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse reads a book five years later and says wtf.

Last fall, after we posted our thoughts on the suffocation of the gay voice in American literature, a reader suggested that for the sake of comparison we check out The Yacoubian Building, by Alaa al Aswany, which said reader described to us — earnestly, and not without indignation — as a good example of a gay voice in Egyptian literature. So we bought the book, have finally read it and are now ready to file our report.

A little background: the novel was a best seller in Egypt for two years running — 2002 and 2003 — and was acclaimed for “breaking taboos” with its “frank sexuality,” including (omg!) that of the homo variety; NPR — among others — loved it: “Packed with uncomfortable truths,” writes Robert Siegel of All Things Considered on the back of our paperback edition, “it is as much about the human condition as the Egyptian character.”

The plot is built around an old colonial-era building (the Yacoubian) in downtown Cairo, where the author presents the comings and goings of about a dozen characters, each of whom could be said to represent a segment of Egyptian society. There is a fading aristocrat who spends his time chasing after whores; a corrupt politician who rigs elections and also chases after whores (wait, is this Albany?); a crafty businessman who sells cheap whatever; a couple of whores, who — because some taboos are not in fact broken — are lower-class women with no choice but to sell their bodies; a working-class teenage boy who is denied entrance into the state police academy and consequently turns into an Islamic terrorist; and so on.

Aswany presents all of this in a lyrical-enough prose that probably explains the NPR infatuation and occasionally offers a glimmer of emotional complexity, or at least enough to carry us through to the end. At times it was enjoyable, albeit in a major-network-mini-series-about-Egypt kind of way, which is to say the characters felt more like placards than people. But because this is about Egypt, we are fascinated! We come away with the sense that just like the United States it is a very corrupt place, ruled by thugs, bourgeois hypocrites and religious fundamentalists.

We might have embraced this empty-calories treatment were it not for two more serious flaws: the first is Aswany’s treatment of “the gays” in his book, which can be described as unintentionally hilarious but ultimately off-putting. Though Aswany — unlike most post-war American writers — must be commended for noting the existence of homosexuality, the book is nevertheless filled with passages such as this:

Homosexuals… often excel in professions that depend on contact with other people, such as public relations, acting, brokering, and the law. Their success in these fields is attributable to their lack of that sense of shame that costs others opportunities, while their sexual lives, filled as they are with diverse and unusal encounters, give them deeper insight into human nature and make them more capable of influencing others. We wish! Lol!

Or check this out:

[Homosexuals] make themselves known to one another and hold secret conversations by means of hand movements. Thus, if one of them takes the other’s hand and strokes his wrist with his finger while shaking it, that means that he desires him, and if a man brings two fingers together and moves them while talking to someone, this means that he is inviting his interlocutor to have sex, and if he points to his heart with one finger, it means that his lover has sole possession of his heart, and so on. Seriously? — secret code — LOL!!! Don’t stop, please!!! Hilarious!!!

Or how about Aswany’s description of Hatim, the effeminate (which is to say, half-French) newspaper reporter:

He tries…with practiced touches, to bring out the feminine side of his beauty. He wears transparent gallabiyas embroidered with beautiful colors over his naked body, is clean-shaven, applies an appropriate and carefully calculated amount of eye pencil to his eyebrows, and uses a small amount of eye shadow. Then he brushes his smooth hair back or leaves stray locks over his forehead. By these means he always attempts, in making himself attractive, to realize the model of the beautiful youth of ancient times. Get it? He’s womanly or “passive” because “tough” guys don’t like to get fucked — lol!

Or this:

With his smart clothes, svelte figure, and fine French features, he would look like a scintillating movie star were it not for the wrinkles that his riotous life has left on his face and that sad, mysterious, gloomy look that often haunts the faces of homosexuals. Now we know why we look so sad and gloomy — damn!

So you get the point. When it comes to the gays, Aswany trades in nothing but stereotypes. And btw (spoiler alert!) guess which character literally gets his head smashed in by his (masculine, married) lover at the end of the book? Moral of the story: queens (and terrorists, cause the terrorist kid also gets blown away) are degenerates who deserve to die!

Meanwhile — and this is serious problem two, which seeps into our consciousness as we read — the author has literary aspirations. Here’s what he says in an interview:

People say Yacoubian Building was popular because of the sex, exposed corruption, police brutality, etc., but won’t acknowledge that, perhaps, it was a good piece of literature.

This? Literature of the good variety? We hate to break it to you, Alaa al Aswany, but in this case “People” are right! Let us get on our soapbox for a moment and say that one job of literature is to deconstruct stereotypes, or at least demonstrate to the reader some awareness that you are using them for a reason, whether irony, sarcasm or humor. And we don’t care where you’re from: please don’t ask us to consider your work “literature” when you give us characters that have no bearing on the complicated truth of the world you so carelessly ignore. [And as a final note, fuck Robert Siegel — who endorsed the idea that it was “controversial” to make a newspaper editor gay — and everyone else who reviewed this positively without slamming the idiotic (if at times hilarious) ignorance that seeps from its pages.]

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse scores selected opinion pieces in The Times.

Bob Herbert/With a Powerful Speech, Obama Offers a Challenge

The Short Version: I’ve been on vacation, but let’s pretend I wasn’t because I still want to talk about Obama’s speech.

In his words: “Racial prejudice, ignorance, hostility — whatever — has caused millions of Americans to vote against their own economic interests, and for policies that have damaged the country.”

Score: C (Cocoon)
We don’t necessarily disagree with anything Herbert has to say here, although we’re annoyed that he writes as if he’s the only person in the world and time froze while he went away. Obama’s speech is officially over, and the question is not whether he was right or not — or even if he’s a thoughtful, gifted orator — but how he’s going to win the election. Here’s a clue: it won’t happen by suddenly changing the minds of racist voters.

David Brooks/The Long Defeat

The Short Version: Hillary Clinton should withdraw.

In his words: “In short, Hillary Clinton’s presidential prospects continue to dim. The door is closing. Night is coming. The end, however, is not near.”

The Score: B- (Belligerent)
We agree that things are not looking good for Clinton — and we’re not sorry about that — but we’re still not convinced that the Clinton-Obama battle is really going to help McCain in the long run. Politicians fight: it’s their job. It will only help Obama in the general election for voters to know that he took out Clinton (or vice versa) to get there, whereas McCain took out…Romney? Huckabee? 9iu11iani?

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank


In which The Gay Recluse explores mythology.

In response to our post on the nasty black smoke seen snaking around the rooftops of Washington Heights, reader David writes:

FYI – asthma is caused more by a bad diet than by the air we breathe.
Love your site, but the “asthma is caused by dirty air” myth should be stopped.

Is this true? An exhaustive search of the literature (by which we mean a ten-second google search of “asthma” and “causes”) reveals this from the Mayo Clinic:

Causes

Asthma is probably due to a combination of environmental and genetic factors. You’re more likely to develop asthma if it runs in your family and if you’re sensitive to environmental allergens or irritants. Early, frequent infections and chronic exposure to secondhand smoke or certain allergens may increase your chances of developing asthma.

Exposure to various allergens and irritants may trigger your asthma symptoms. The following are common things that trigger asthma symptoms:

  • Allergens, such as pollen, animal dander or mold
  • Cockroaches and dust mites
  • Air pollutants and irritants
  • Nasty smoke and dirty air from apartment-building boilers and incinerators*
  • Strong odors or scented products or chemicals
  • Respiratory infections, including the common cold
  • Physical exertion, including exercise
  • Strong emotions and stress
  • Cold air
  • Certain medications, including beta blockers, aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
  • Sulfites, preservatives added to some perishable foods
  • Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), a condition in which stomach acids back up into your esophagus. GERD may trigger an asthma attack or make an attack worse.
  • Sinusitis

*actually, this just said “smoke,” which we assume refers to the cigarette variety

Seriously, in our experience — which is primarily through the lens of taking care of our cat, admittedly different, but still — it’s often difficult to pinpoint the exact causes of asthma symptoms in a particular person. Though we wouldn’t be surprised to learn that diet is in fact more important than dirty air, common sense seems to dictate that smoke and pollutants cannot be good for our lungs (even if it doesn’t cause asthma per se) and should be curtailed as much as possible. Asthma experts and sufferers — or even reader David — any additional insight?

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank